> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> Sorry if i wasn't clear. Yes, the site admin password entered
MM> once and working on all the lists would be great. Now, if I
MM> admin 10 lists with the same list password, and that works
MM> too, even better, but I don'
> "DO" == Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DO> 1) The admin messages doesn't have MIME headers at all:
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
| Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
DO> this is vitally needed to be in czech emails.
I think
Mailed these to Barry too, but again, just in case anyone else is running
into them before Barry gets to them:
Symptom: going to Digest option page doesn't work.
Index: Mailman/Cgi/admin.py
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/mailman/mailman/Mai
> DM> The standard way; config (as me) and "make install" (as root).
>
> Did you install over an existing Mailman 2.0.x installation, or did
> you do a fresh MM2.1 install and copy list directories over?
I've been running "latest CVS" for some time, so it was a previous revision
of 2.1a.
>
I am also triing to upgrade to never version and I have this troubles:
Upgrading from version 0x20005f0 to 0x20100a4
getting rid of old source files
fixing all the perms on your old html archives to work with b6
If your archives are big, this could take a minute or two...
hotovo
Updating mailing
This may be lame, because already there.. so excuse if.. (and explain ..)
Please CC me on all correspondence, since I'm not the
m.m.-developers list (I wouldn't be competent!)
I've been administering a few mailing lists for several years
now, one of which with about 800 subscribers and 30 postin
> "ES" == Ellen Spertus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ES> The biggest implementation question in my mind is whether I
ES> should store subscription information in a relational database
ES> (so I can make the above efficient query) or build on top of
ES> the exiting pickles.
I
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> One thing's missing currently though: the ability to flag a
BAW> member as a spammer and thus move them from probation to a
BAW> ban list. That ought to be easy to add, and I will for
BAW> MM2.1beta1; the hard part w
> "GFN" == George F Nemeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GFN> Mailman needs an option to enforce plain text posts by
GFN> detecting and rejecting posts in non-plain formats,
GFN> particularly HTML.
Adding the baseline mechanism to do this wouldn't be difficult; you'd
just need to
My students and I have built a prototype system, Javamlm, supporting user
subscriptions on a per-thread basis using standard MUAs.I approached
Barry about adding threads to Mailman, and he kindly encouraged me to do
so. I'm now trying to figure out the best way to add the functionality and
- Lists frequently erupt into flames about posts in HTML.
- MUA's will often respond to an HTML message by replying in HTML,
perpetuating the problem caused by an initial HTML post.
- Even users normally posting plain text often slip up, particularly
when mailing from other than their norm
> "GFN" == George F Nemeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Has anyone heard rumors that big spamhauses are planning to
>> deploy new technology to attack mailing lists, or for that
>> matter are planning anything specific for this spring?
GFN> I've not heard rumors, but the
Discussions on another list bring up something to consider:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:19:24 -0500 (EST)
From: "George F. Nemeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bulk email explosion this spring?
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Tim Pierce wrote:
I have also installed
this version for testing the Czech translations. And I have found
some bugs. The biggest hangs on admin page, becouse I have send it
from wrong address. Here are some more:
1) The admin messages doesn't have MIME headers at all:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; c
>> Wondering if you're also testing SpamCop, http://www.spamcop.com.
>> The work of a Seattleite named Julian Haight, http://www.julianhaight.com,
>> and have any comment.
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> I haven't evaluated it, but I'm afraid I've a bit of a bone to
> pick with it. F
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:57:39 -0800
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wondering if you're also testing SpamCop, http://www.spamcop.com.
Nope. I was rather steered off it by being on the annoying
receiving end of its alerts and bounces (some of the users of the
local Linux UG use it). That
16 matches
Mail list logo
