On Tuesday 23 April 2002 06:02 pm, you wrote:
> >> A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad
> >> enough, but
> >
> > Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
> > *months*. Our central scanners nail about 1,400 of them *a day*.
>
> This is a new variant
At 14:35 -0700 4/23/2002, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>I just got sent a new copy of the Klez.E virus. The text it sends to the
>user is this:
>
>--
>Klez.E is the most common world-wide spreading worm.It's very dangerous by
>corrupting your files.
Ah...there's one now. It came in a text/html part,
At 03:02 PM 4/23/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> >> A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
> >
> > Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
> > *months*. Our central scanners nail about 1,400 of them *a day*.
>
>This is a new variant
At 02:35 PM 4/23/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>I just got sent a new copy of the Klez.E virus. The text it sends to the
>user is this:
plus, as i recall, there's a *second* virus in the payload as well. A
two-fer if you will.
The sad this is, if you read the various klez codes, it's some
>> A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
>
> Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
> *months*. Our central scanners nail about 1,400 of them *a day*.
This is a new variant, not the old Klez. And it's getting worse.
--
Chuq Von Ro
At 10:07 AM 4/23/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>Passing this along, because this has implications to list owners.
>
>A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
*months*. Our central scanners nai
I just got sent a new copy of the Klez.E virus. The text it sends to the
user is this:
--
Klez.E is the most common world-wide spreading worm.It's very dangerous by
corrupting your files.
Because of its very smart stealth and anti-anti-virus technic,most common AV
software can't detect or clean
On 4/23/02 11:22 AM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mailman does not store the membership list in a text file. Further,
> under 2.1 Mailman may not store the membership list at all, but
> depending on local configuration may only have the ability to query
> (LDAP, SQL, whatever) an
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:49:37 +0200 (CEST)
Antenna Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear people, We just experienced a loop: a message was sent many times
> because it wasn't deleted in the /home/mailman/qfiles directory The
> error mailed was:
> /usr/bin/python -S /home/mailman/cron/qrunner
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:26:11 +0200
h huelsebusch wrote:
> Hi ! Is it possible that you insert Traffic-Accounting in Mailman ?
> Don't know, but I think it's not so difficult, Mailman has to do
> something like "(MailSize) * (actually members of the list)", stored
> in a PLAIN-textfile, so it w
At 10:07 AM 23/04/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>This is an emerging worm, and it looks pretty ugly. It has hit Hong Kong and
>Great Britain worst so far, but it's spreading rapidly accordind to people
>I've talked to.
I have to say, I've seen it already quite a bit on some of the linuxchix
Passing this along, because this has implications to list owners.
A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
this one has the hack that instead of repropogating via email using the
owners email address, it repropogates using a random address in the infected
machine'
I just created a new list via the web interface, and the 'host_name'
parameter for the list was "www.cfrq.net" (the value of
DEFAULT_URL_HOST) instead of "cfrq.net" (the value of
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST).
This surprised me...
Mailman/Cgi/create.py uses the VIRTUAL_HOSTS stuff to get the correct
value
Further to what I said before (see below), I now enclose a patch to correct
the problem. The patch is to the WebAuthenticate function in
Mailman.SecurityManager. It adopts the simple hypothesis that if you are
setting or checking a cookie then the response about to be made shouldn't
be cached.
Hi !
Is it possible that you insert Traffic-Accounting in Mailman ?
Don't know, but I think it's not so difficult, Mailman has to do something
like "(MailSize) * (actually members of the list)", stored in a
PLAIN-textfile, so it will also be possible to parse the total traffic,
monthly oder da
15 matches
Mail list logo
