At 04:40 PM 5/7/02 +0200, Danny Terweij wrote:
>And also you see here the vcard problem!
>Nice this list is upgraded to the mm2.1 beta :-)
>I want get rid of these lines when send an vcard as attachment in an HTML mail.
>
I think that's your client doing that... I'm not seeing the HR lines in
Le Tue, May 07, 2002 at 08:32:07AM -0700, Chuq Von Rospach a écrit:
> That's why List-ID was invented and why Mailman supports it.
Does the term 'history' means something to you ?
I'm beginning to be very tired to modify my filters with each new
release of mailman. And I used Sender because, for
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:53:42AM -0500, Bill Bradford wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:09:46PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > You don't need to do that. I've moved lists before and that step is not
> > necessary if you move everything you need (list, archives, and alias entries
> > if you
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:09:46PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> You don't need to do that. I've moved lists before and that step is not
> necessary if you move everything you need (list, archives, and alias entries
> if you're not running exim)
So far, I've done this numerous times, and it *i
--On Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:41 AM -0400 "Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I ask because, although I don't do procmail, I still filter stuff in
> my MUA, but I do it on either a `recip' filter (which matches To: and
> Cc:) or the Subject: header, which matches the prefix.
To: and
"Chuq Von Rospach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm sorry, but I'll take a hard line here. If you're filtering messages
THE
> WRONG WAY (using Sender instead of List-ID), then you shouldn't complain
> that it breaks because you're using a head
On 5/7/02 7:04 AM, "Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AL> When other sites will upgrade, if they generate lots of
> AL> traffic, it will be a pain to filter the posts by hand...
>
> Sigh, you can't win, can ya?
I'm sorry, but I'll take a hard line here. If you're filtering mess
On 5/6/02 11:12 PM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sadly, less than a third of the lists I'm subscribed to have RFC 2369
> headers. All but (counts quickly) 6 (all Yahoo Groups) have unique
> Sender: headers tho.
So? So use list-id when it exists, and filter on non-standard things
From: "Harald Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > And also you see here the vcard problem!>
> Nice this list is upgraded to the mm2.1 beta :-)> > I want get
rid of these lines when send an vcard as attachment in => >
an HTML mail. > I think you're confused. There are no
lines in the first me
> And also you see here the vcard problem!
> Nice this list is upgraded to the mm2.1 beta :-)
> I want get rid of these lines when send an vcard as attachment in =
> an HTML mail.
I think you're confused. There are no lines in the first message
you sent (the one with the vcard attached). Your m
And also you see here the vcard problem!
Nice this list is upgraded to the mm2.1 beta :-)
I want get rid of these lines when send an vcard as
attachment in an HTML mail.
- Original Message -
From:
Danny Terweij
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4
Hi,
When deleting a list with ./rmlist, all the held messages stored are not
erased. (~mailman/data)
Danny.
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Terweij;Dannny
FN:Dannny Terweij
NICKNAME:POEMA
NOTE:POEMA SERVICES
X-WAB-GENDER:2
URL;HOME:http://poema.yi.org
URL;WORK:http://poema.yi.org
BDAY:200
> "DG" == David Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DG> Just to clarify what I did ... I did a virgin install of
DG> 2.1b2, copied over the entire "lists/list-owners" directory
DG> from my 2.0.10 install directory to 2.1b2 directory, then ran
DG> bin/update -f.
And you're posi
> "AL" == Arnaud Launay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AL> Question is, why did it change between 2.0.10 and 2.1.b2 :-)
The -admin address is deprecated. We wanted to unify the the address
extension and the script that handles them because it makes life much
more easy for MTA integration
At 12:36 AM 5/7/2002, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>What happens when you do
>
> % bin/withlist list-owners
> >>> m.topics
/usr/local/mailman $bin/withlist list-owners
Loading list list-owners (unlocked)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bin/withlist", line 271, in ?
main()
Fi
Le Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:27:27AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw a écrit:
> In any event, I don't see changing the Sender: header any time
> soon, so I'd like to say it's fixed in stone <3.0 wink>.
Question is, why did it change between 2.0.10 and 2.1.b2 :-)
When other sites will upgrade, if they gener
16 matches
Mail list logo
