[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-584989 ] bounced large messagesare deleted!

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #584989, was opened at 2002-07-22 12:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=584989&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to:

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2-production ready?

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "DB" == Daniel Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DB> also have a bunch of errors in logs/error... :-/ They are DB> mostly "ValueError: year out of range" errors (see bug DB> #571634). I also have a few "AlreadyLockedError"s: Fixed, and fixed. DB> And a couple of web tr

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-571634 ] Date: header fieldhandling

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #571634, was opened at 2002-06-20 09:08 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=571634&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Why both a .msg and .db in qfiles?

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JRM" == Jason R Mastaler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JRM> For every incoming message waiting to be posted, MM writes JRM> both a .msg file containing the message text, and a .db file JRM> containing meta-information about that message. JRM> I'm curious why MM doesn't just

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Why both a .msg and .db in qfiles?

2002-07-24 Thread J C Lawrence
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:20:49 -0600 Jason R Mastaler wrote: > I'm curious why MM doesn't just store the rfc822 headers and message > body in the .db pickle/marshal as well? Why maintain two files > instead of just one? One advantage of the flat text message file is that it can be edited by ext

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-425121 ] Double moderatorapproval messages

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #425121, was opened at 2001-05-18 10:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=425121&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.0.x Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Gert Jan Kruizinga (gjk4all) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-564587 ] config_list breaks atfilter_mime_types

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #564587, was opened at 2002-06-04 14:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=564587&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Devin L. Ganger (dlganger) >Assig

[Mailman-Developers] Why both a .msg and .db in qfiles?

2002-07-24 Thread Jason R . Mastaler
For every incoming message waiting to be posted, MM writes both a .msg file containing the message text, and a .db file containing meta-information about that message. I'm curious why MM doesn't just store the rfc822 headers and message body in the .db pickle/marshal as well? Why maintain two fi

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-564587 ] config_list breaks atfilter_mime_types

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #564587, was opened at 2002-06-04 21:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=564587&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Devin L. Ganger (dlganger) Assign

Re[2]: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Luigi Rosa
Hello Barry, BAW> Dale> [ 565917 ] mailmanctl bombs after unclean shutdown BAW> Thanks Dale. I fixed this in a slightly different way, but I BAW> appreciate the patch submission. BAW> Should be fixed in cvs now. Thank you, guys. In a few hours I will be leaving to London, I'll be back on S

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "D" == Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dale> Problem diagnosed with suggested fix (works for me) at: Dale> [ 565917 ] mailmanctl bombs after unclean shutdown Thanks Dale. I fixed this in a slightly different way, but I appreciate the patch submission. Should be fixed in cvs n

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-565917 ] mailmanctl bombs afterunclean shutdown

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #565917, was opened at 2002-06-07 14:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=565917&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dale Stimson (dstimson) Assi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Dale
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:21:07AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > "LR" == Luigi Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > LR> Hello, half an hour ago I suffered an unscheduled power > LR> outage, when my Linux (RH 7.3) rebooted, I had to correct an > LR> unlinked i-node in /tmp file

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585833 ] Forward posts held forapproval

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585833, was opened at 2002-07-24 10:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585833&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ousmane Wilane (wilane) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-579285 ] gate_news attemptsconnect to bad hosts

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #579285, was opened at 2002-07-09 15:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=579285&group_id=103 Category: nntp/news Group: 2.0.x Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Fox (drfickle) Assigned to: Nobody/Ano

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Modifying mailman to filter archivedmessages

2002-07-24 Thread Laurence Berland
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 12:39 pm, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > "LB" == Laurence Berland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > LB> Just to clarify, body=msg.get_payload() sets body to the msg > LB> payload, and msg.set_payload(body) sets the msg payload to > LB> body, right? > > Basically,

Fwd: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Modifying mailman to filter archivedmessages

2002-07-24 Thread Laurence Berland
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 12:48 am, you wrote: > E.g. you'd do msg.get(fieldname) to get the contents of a header, and > "del msg[fieldname] ; msg[fieldname] = value" to replace the contents > of a header. msg.attach(attachment) or msg.set_payload(body) to > manipulate the body of a message, etc.

[Mailman-Developers] Mm documentation server change

2002-07-24 Thread Christopher Kolar
IMSA will be making some significant server changes this weekend, changes that will impact the location of the Mailman documents that we host. The new URL will be: http://staff.imsa.edu/~ckolar/mailman The pages will no longer be hosted on www.imsa.edu. There will be NO URL FORWARD

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-584989 ] bounced large messagesare deleted!

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #584989, was opened at 2002-07-22 18:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=584989&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585776 ] no webauthentificationpossible

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585776, was opened at 2002-07-24 10:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585776&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to: Nobo

Re[2]: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Luigi Rosa
Hello Barry, Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 5:47:43 PM, you wrote: BAW> Hmm, I guess you need to check your logs for any errors that might be BAW> occuring during boot up. Restart works fine for me on RH7.3 (and BAW> 6.1). The boot was not after a graceful shutdown, but after a power loss. Check my

Re: Re[2]: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "LR" == Luigi Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LR> Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 5:21:07 PM, you wrote: BAW> Sounds like you don't have things set up to restart on reboot BAW> properly. Did you follow the installation directions to BAW> chkconfig --add the mailman script to t

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585833 ] Forward posts held forapproval

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585833, was opened at 2002-07-24 06:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585833&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ousmane Wilane (wilane) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-579285 ] gate_news attemptsconnect to bad hosts

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #579285, was opened at 2002-07-09 16:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=579285&group_id=103 Category: nntp/news Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Fox (drfickle) Assigned to: Nobody/A

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585229 ] opening holes bychanging permissions?

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585229, was opened at 2002-07-22 22:03 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585229&group_id=103 Category: configuring/installing Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Marshall (paulmarshll) Ass

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-579908 ] Very poor configurationdesign

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #579908, was opened at 2002-07-10 20:53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=579908&group_id=103 Category: configuring/installing Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Tanner (tanner) Assigned to: No

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-582274 ] Duplicate SubscriptionRequest

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #582274, was opened at 2002-07-16 10:44 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=582274&group_id=103 Category: (un)subscribing Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: rich cowan (leftlink) Assigned to

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-582891 ] Mailman converting = to=3D

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #582891, was opened at 2002-07-17 11:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=582891&group_id=103 Category: (un)subscribing Group: 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jake Rosenbalm (jakerose) Assigned to: No

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585229 ] opening holes bychanging permissions?

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585229, was opened at 2002-07-22 23:03 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585229&group_id=103 Category: configuring/installing Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Marshall (paulmarshll) Ass

Re[2]: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Luigi Rosa
Hello Barry, Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 5:21:07 PM, you wrote: BAW> Sounds like you don't have things set up to restart on reboot BAW> properly. Did you follow the installation directions to chkconfig BAW> --add the mailman script to the proper run levels? Yes, this is the chiconfig status for

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585833 ] Forward posts held forapproval

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585833, was opened at 2002-07-24 10:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585833&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ousmane Wilane (wilane) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585484 ] virtual domain listsmisdirect autoreply

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585484, was opened at 2002-07-23 12:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585484&group_id=103 Category: bounce detection Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Byron T. Watts (btwatts) Assigned to: Nob

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "LR" == Luigi Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LR> Hello, half an hour ago I suffered an unscheduled power LR> outage, when my Linux (RH 7.3) rebooted, I had to correct an LR> unlinked i-node in /tmp file system (apparently a .pid file). LR> The qrunner deamon did not star

[Mailman-Developers] 2.1b2 error after reboot

2002-07-24 Thread Luigi Rosa
Hello, half an hour ago I suffered an unscheduled power outage, when my Linux (RH 7.3) rebooted, I had to correct an unlinked i-node in /tmp file system (apparently a .pid file). The qrunner deamon did not start and reported this error: Jul 24 16:34:34 2002 mailmanctl(1040): Traceback (most recen

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-577685 ] sh syntax problem inconfigure

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #577685, was opened at 2002-07-05 03:35 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=577685&group_id=103 Category: configuring/installing Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Assi

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585270 ] qrunner fails withRHL7.2 python 1.5.2

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585270, was opened at 2002-07-23 03:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585270&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stuart Prescott (themill) Assigned to:

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585776 ] no webauthentificationpossible

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585776, was opened at 2002-07-24 04:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585776&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to: No

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585833 ] Forward posts held forapproval

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585833, was opened at 2002-07-24 06:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585833&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ousmane Wilane (wilane) Assigned to

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Announce] Candidate Mailman2.0.13patch

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
Glad it's working for you now. > "GAVH" == G Armour Van Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GAVH> Now I'm counting on you to release this patch so that the GAVH> 2.0.13 to 2.0.14 patch will work on my machine, or perhaps GAVH> document some way I can remove this patch before instal

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Modifying mailman to filter archivedmessages

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "PB" == Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Too old. MM2.0.x is in the critical patch only phase of its >> life, and even that is getting difficult to do correctly >> (witness the 2.0.12 problem w/ Python 1.5.2). PB> Has there been an official release of 2.1?

Re: [Mailman-Developers] problems with mailman 2.0.12 qrunner failingto process any messages

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "CD" == Chris Dagdigian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: CD> Last night I patched my 2.0.12 distribution with the patch CD> shown in this email: CD> http://mail.python.org/pipermail-21/mailman-developers/2002-July/012476.html CD> It worked wonderfully -- all mail including the

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-584989 ] bounced large messagesare deleted!

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #584989, was opened at 2002-07-22 12:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=584989&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Announce] Candidate Mailman 2.0.13patch

2002-07-24 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "ST" == Sotiris Tsimbonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ST> I am running Mailman 2.0.12 with Python 1.5.2 on a linux box, ST> and had problems with torequests.. with this candidate patch ST> they seem to be fixed, as all messages in the queue have now ST> been processed and t

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Announce] Candidate Mailman 2.0.13patch

2002-07-24 Thread G. Armour Van Horn
Barry, As I'm running Mailman 2.0.12 on RedHat 6.2, therefore with Python 1.5.2 from the RPM in the original install, and since I've had the problem twice now, I went right for it. After realizing that I couldn't paste the text into a Pico window (the longest lines broke, giving patch errors) I

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Announce] Candidate Mailman 2.0.13patch

2002-07-24 Thread Sotiris Tsimbonis
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > As some of you have noticed, Mailman 2.0.12 has some compatibility > problems with Python 1.5.2. [...] > I'd especially like to hear from those of you experiencing problems > with MailCommandHandler, if you are running MM2.0.12 with Python > 1.5.2. Do

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-584917 ] Extra slash in privatearchive URL

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #584917, was opened at 2002-07-22 10:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=584917&group_id=103 Category: None Group: 2.0.x Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 2 Submitted By: Nick Arnett (narnett) Assigned to: Nobody/

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Modifying mailman to filter archivedmessages

2002-07-24 Thread Phil Barnett
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 00:52, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > Too old. MM2.0.x is in the critical patch only phase of its life, and > even that is getting difficult to do correctly (witness the 2.0.12 > problem w/ Python 1.5.2). Has there been an official release of 2.1? _

Re: [Mailman-Developers] problems with mailman 2.0.12 qrunner failingto process any messages

2002-07-24 Thread Chris Dagdigian
Last night I patched my 2.0.12 distribution with the patch shown in this email: http://mail.python.org/pipermail-21/mailman-developers/2002-July/012476.html It worked wonderfully -- all mail including the ones that caused qrunner to stop have all been processed fine. No errors at all in the l

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585833 ] Forward posts held forapproval

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585833, was opened at 2002-07-24 10:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585833&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ousmane Wilane (wilane) Assigned to: Nob

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-585776 ] no webauthentificationpossible

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585776, was opened at 2002-07-24 10:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=585776&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to: Nobody/

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-584989 ] bounced large messagesare deleted!

2002-07-24 Thread noreply
Bugs item #584989, was opened at 2002-07-22 18:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=584989&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to