Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailpasswds and SuppressPasswordReminder

2003-02-03 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JP" == Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JP> It looks like the "massive rewrite" that occured between JP> revisions 2.5 and 2.5 of cron/mailpasswds removed the JP> SuppressPasswordReminder check. JP> Attached is a totally untested patch provided simply to JP> sugg

Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailpasswds and SuppressPasswordReminder

2003-02-03 Thread Jon Parise
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:14:22PM -0500, Jon Parise wrote: > It looks like the "massive rewrite" that occured between revisions 2.5 > and 2.5 of cron/mailpasswds removed the SuppressPasswordReminder > check. > > Attached is a totally untested patch provided simply to suggest a > possible fix.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.1 ETA?

2003-02-03 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Unfortunately no. Due to recent changes in my work situation, >> I'm only able to work on Mailman in my spare time these days. BF> Ah, that sucks. Only if you don't have an adversarial relationship with your pillow: http

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Just a thought about documentation

2003-02-03 Thread Marc Perkel
I'm glad you like the idea Barry. No - I don't have any contacts. But someone else might have contacts. My idea in creating documentation is that the student or perhaps a small group of student would work with developers who would make sure that the new information was accurate. Also - as part

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Just a thought about documentation

2003-02-03 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "MP" == Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MP> One problem with developers writing their own documentation is MP> that the developer never experienced learning the program. One MP> of the problems with almost all free software is that the MP> documentation could be a lo

[Mailman-Developers] Just a thought about documentation

2003-02-03 Thread Marc Perkel
One problem with developers writing their own documentation is that the developer never experienced learning the program. One of the problems with almost all free software is that the documentation could be a lot better. There are also many schools out there that have courses for people who want

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.1 ETA?

2003-02-03 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: Unfortunately no. Due to recent changes in my work situation, I'm only able to work on Mailman in my spare time these days. Ah, that sucks. I find it's nearly impossible just to keep up on the lists. Yeah, release of 2.1 has

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.1 ETA?

2003-02-03 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BF> Is there an ETA on 2.1.1? It's hard to justify using sources BF> from CVS in production, and it's becoming a bit annoying BF> trying to remember all the patches to apply when a new fix BF> comes along. :) Unfortunately

[Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.1 ETA?

2003-02-03 Thread Bryan Fullerton
Howdy, Is there an ETA on 2.1.1? It's hard to justify using sources from CVS in production, and it's becoming a bit annoying trying to remember all the patches to apply when a new fix comes along. :) Thanks, Bryan ___ Mailman-Developers mailing lis

[Mailman-Developers] Oddness with handle-opts.html and subscribe.html

2003-02-03 Thread Mike Holderness
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm using MailMan 2.0.6 - upgrading isn't under my control since I don't run the server. The results pages handle-opts.html and subscribe.html seem to be returning " Mike [1] if I see a pattern I'll provide a test case. __