On Thursday 25 September 2003 20:14, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> >> The attached message has been automatically discarded.
> >> It should be
> >> The attached message was automatically discarded.
>
> Dan> I don't agree. Why is the latter more correct?
>
> "was" connotes that an action
Skip Montanaro wrote:
>> I know this is anal, but it bugs me every time Mailman discards a
>> message then sends me a note with this text:
>>
>> The attached message has been automatically discarded.
>>
>> It should be
>>
>> The attached message was automatically
I would like to be able to flag specific topics as mandatory. For
example "ADMIN:", as a topic, would also go to every user no matter
their topic selection.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He live
> "was" connotes that an action happened in the past and is over and done
> with. "has been" connotes that the action was started, but might not have
> completed.
I disagree. To me, the sentence with "was" gives the impression that it
just simply happened. The sentence with "has been" seems more
>> I know this is anal, but it bugs me every time Mailman discards a
>> message then sends me a note with this text:
>>
>> The attached message has been automatically discarded.
>>
>> It should be
>>
>> The attached message was automatically discarded.
Dan>
On 9/25/03 6:17 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I know this is anal, but it bugs me every time Mailman discards a message
then sends me a note with this text:
The attached message has been automatically discarded.
It should be
The attached message was automatically discarded.
FYI.
I don't ag
I know this is anal, but it bugs me every time Mailman discards a message
then sends me a note with this text:
The attached message has been automatically discarded.
It should be
The attached message was automatically discarded.
FYI.
--
Skip Montanaro
Got gigs? http://www.musi-cal.co
> -Original Message-
> From: Kory Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:13 PM
>
>
> I know that a subscriber can unsubscribe themselves without a
> password
> using the email command, or someone else can
> unsubscribe the user if they know their pas
Hi,
I just submitted a patch to SourceForge (#810675) that adds a checkbox
'Discard all messages marked "Defer"' to the admindb page. This checkbox
greatly reduces the time I spend processing spam, since I need to click
only on messages to be accepted or explicitly rejected. Patch applies to
"mail
I have full personalization on now and it seems to work fine, the to:
header is rewritten with the recipient's address. Is there a way to
tell mailman not to also include the cc: with the list address? This
is an announce-only list and there's no need for the recipients to see
the list addre
We're looking for someone with Mailman expertise that we could hire to work
with us on our Mailman application. If you are interested and available,
please send me an email with your resume or description of qualifications
and fees.
Thank you.
Lisa Kimball
Group Jazz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 22:23, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> Try this;
> http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.013.htp
I've updated this FAQ entry to describe the removeMember() method which
would be better to use, if possible.
Also, I remember providing a remove_members recipe in s
12 matches
Mail list logo
