At 1:37 AM -0400 2003/09/28, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I really really want to use something like message-ids to generate
message file names.
IIRC, Earl talks about this in the FAQ. In short, for security
reasons, you can't trust any of the information you are given
anywhere in the message, unless
[John A. Martin]
>> "baw" == Barry Warsaw
>> "Re: [Mailman-Developers] "@" in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives"
>> Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:45:32 -0400
>
> baw> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote:
> >> [Barry Warsaw]
> >>
> >> > I really really want to u
FWIW: We have Mailman archive recent email and then use MHonArc to
build our 'permanent' archives. I'm happy as long as I can get a copy of
the original email. I may put up an edited version of some messages but
keep the original - just in case.
Gary
John A. Martin wrote:
trim
I am not as con
[Barry Warsaw]
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote:
>> 2) Whenever Mailman receives a message whose message-id is already
>> present in the archives, the original Message-Id: header is
>> renamed to e.g. X-Original-Message-Id:, and Mailman generates a
>> fresh (as in "n
> "baw" == Barry Warsaw
> "Re: [Mailman-Developers] "@" in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives"
> Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:45:32 -0400
baw> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote:
>> [Barry Warsaw]
>>
>> > I really really want to use something like message-ids
Okay, I'm going to be cutting Mailman 2.1.3 over the next hour or so.
avalon and duke9 are getting their 11th hour updates in, but those will
probably be the last. :)
-Barry
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 09:21, ned wrote:
> Hello list,
> i've been poking and prodding mailman for about an hour now...found a few
> things which could be not seen as secure (although they dont have any real
> impact...):
> first there is a XSS (cross site scripting) bug in create.py in Cgi/. just
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 08:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Also, I just spewed the mailman-developers archive through
> mhonarc 2.6.8. One thing I noticed off the bat is that message files
> are given sequential numbers just like pipermail. That isn't what I
> want!
MHonArc has a lengthy configuration
Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the status of i18n of MHonarc ?
>
> At least, MHonArc-ed japanese mail archives doesn't impress me much.
Seconded. I once wrote a patch to MHonarc to support UTF-8 on all
pages, and it was eventually incorporated, but MHonarc's
multiple-encodin
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > "Roger" == Roger Bivand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:26:58 +0200 (CEST) writes:
>
> .
>
>
> Roger> The second thing, ...: my answer on r-help to a pixmap question
> Roger> was:
>
> Roger> ...
>
Hello list,
i've been poking and prodding mailman for about an hour now...found a few
things which could be not seen as secure (although they dont have any real
impact...):
first there is a XSS (cross site scripting) bug in create.py in Cgi/. just
enter
">alert("hi"). putting a Utils.Websafe (i
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 02:06, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> MHonArc has a lengthy configuration file, not to mention the possibility
> of patches. What's exactly the result you would like to see?
See my other followup.
-Barry
___
Mailman-Developers maili
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote:
> [Barry Warsaw]
>
> > I really really want to use something like message-ids to generate
> > message file names. I want to be able to generate links to archived
> > messages in the footers, but I think the best way to do that is to agree
> > on a
[Barry Warsaw]
> I really really want to use something like message-ids to generate
> message file names. I want to be able to generate links to archived
> messages in the footers, but I think the best way to do that is to agree
> on a reproducible, independent algorithm for calculating them.
Wh
14 matches
Mail list logo
