Hi,
anybody here who could deliver Python code for the following?
In news2mail direction, I'd like to "translate" the F'up2 header
(containing one or more newsgroups) to the Reply-To: header by
preserving any already existing Reply-To addresses.
One of four mailing lists is assigned to each of f
I suppose it can be, but it is a question of where you implement your security.
If mailman is to use SQL to store preferences then it is up to mm to deal with
what records a user can update. If the mm interface to LDAP goes through one
master LDAP account, then it is still mm's job... But if mm bin
Isn't LDAP a bit of a security hassle? I would think it is pretty
common to
have Mailman running on a machine along side MySQL, Apache and and MTA
of
some sort but wouldn't throwing in LDAP be more like requiring people
install
a CVS daemon to use Mailman? I'm no LDAP guru but from what I hav
On January 31, 2004 11:10 am, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> Mailman <-> LDAP as an interface means that anything that can generate
> an LDAP interface can talk to it. so perhaps the best thing to do is
> come up with an LDAP interface, define how the LDAP data should look,
> and then create a set of My
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Dale Newfield wrote:
> if we want to start these discussions before March.
Oh--I forgot to mention--I'll be joining Barry and whoever in March for
Sunday and Monday of the sprint, and I've got a bunch of SQL experience...
...wasn't somebody asking if anybody fit that descripti
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Kevin McCann wrote:
> I'm wondering if some inroads can be made even before the sprint session
> in March. I can show you and Barry the DB stuff I had in mind and maybe
> we can jumpstart from there.
I likewise had an abortive attempt to make the api changes necessary to
fold
On Jan 31, 2004, at 10:53 AM, Jeff Warnica wrote:
I feel bad about jumping in to this discussion, and not necessaraly
being
prepared to offer any real help, but anyway.
LDAP may be a better data[base|sink] for configuration data then SQL.
actually, Jeff has a point. I was muttering to myself abo
I feel bad about jumping in to this discussion, and not necessaraly being
prepared to offer any real help, but anyway.
LDAP may be a better data[base|sink] for configuration data then SQL. It may be
harder to work with (only because less people have experience with it), and it
may be less usefull t
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 23:49, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2004, at 12:13 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > It's possible. But then again who knows what the email landscape will
> > look like in 5 years? I'm betting it'll look a /lot/ different than it
> > does today, unless it doesn't.
>
> Rai
