Re: [Mailman-Developers] Small patch to templates/en/verify.txt

2004-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:07, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > I know Peer as a good server admin, but in terms of German language I > have not seen anything in Mailman that looks like that "champions" might > have worked on that stuff (it was obviously not Peer only, BTW). > > No offense, just what I'm

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Small patch to templates/en/verify.txt

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Michael Heydekamp on 03.02.04: > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:53, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Well, I can deliver tons of such kinda fixes for the German >> translation in the meantime, if there should be any interest. > You should work with Peer on any German upd

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Small patch to templates/en/verify.txt

2004-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:53, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > Well, I can deliver tons of such kinda fixes for the German translation > in the meantime, if there should be any interest. You should work with Peer on any German updates, since he's the current champion. > If somebody would just care also

Re: [Mailman-Developers] AOL's requirements for spam complaints

2004-02-03 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:45 AM -0500 2004/02/03, Kevin McCann wrote: Another article, which might be OT to the thread but nevertheless interesting: http://john.redmood.com/osfastest.html It is co-authored by a Lyris dude and looks at OS choices and performance-related sub-topics. I was wondering when someone

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Small patch to templates/en/verify.txt

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03.02.04: > On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 19:42, Todd wrote: >> -If you do not wish to be subscribed from this list, please simply >> +If you do not wish to be subscribed to this list, please simply >> Thanks as always for the great software! > Thanks f

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Admins not getting admin messages

2004-02-03 Thread Skip Montanaro
Barry> In the General admin page, check the value for Barry> admin_immed_notify. >> That's already set to Yes... :-/ Barry> Hmm. My sentiments exactly. I'm not at all familiar with the Mailman source code, but it appears that the decision to send out an admin message is made in

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Admins not getting admin messages

2004-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:00, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Barry> In the General admin page, check the value for > Barry> admin_immed_notify. That controls whether you get those pending > Barry> subscription notifications and such. > > That's already set to Yes... :-/ Hmm. -Barry

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Admins not getting admin messages

2004-02-03 Thread Skip Montanaro
Barry> In MM2.1, the -admin address is an alias for -bounces not -owner. Thanks for this clarification. Barry> In the General admin page, check the value for Barry> admin_immed_notify. That controls whether you get those pending Barry> subscription notifications and such. That'

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Small patch to templates/en/verify.txt

2004-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 19:42, Todd wrote: > Here is a very simple patch to correct a small typo I noticed in > templates/en/verify.txt. It's included below and attached as a > unified diff against the current CVS, just in case that makes some > developers life a little easier. > > -If you do

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Well-formed and valid HTML

2004-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 09:50, Stefan Michalowski wrote: > I'm guessing that the 3.0 release will need a rewrite of the > translations anyway, but what is the status of this release? Is it worth > working on the 2.1.x templates or will the 2.1.x be obsolete very soon. Personally, I don't think it

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Admins not getting admin messages

2004-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 08:49, Skip Montanaro wrote: > After upgrading from MM 2.0 to 2.1 several months ago, admin messages > (pending subscriptions, mail from non-members) stopped going to the three of > us who administer the cedu mailing list. We don't learn about this stuff > until the daily su

[Mailman-Developers] Well-formed and valid HTML

2004-02-03 Thread Stefan Michalowski
Hi, I would like to rewrite the mailman HTML templates so that they are well-formed and valid HTML (preferably XHTML 1.0). I started doing this but then noticed that some of the HTML is generated inside python code. Because gettext is used for i18n, I know that if I modify the text inside pyth

[Mailman-Developers] Admins not getting admin messages

2004-02-03 Thread Skip Montanaro
I'm sorry to bomb this list with user issues. I've sent a couple notes to mailman-users about this and received no responses, not even "i don't know" or "what have you been smokin'?" mails. After upgrading from MM 2.0 to 2.1 several months ago, admin messages (pending subscriptions, mail from no

Re: [Mailman-Developers] AOL's requirements for spam complaints

2004-02-03 Thread Kevin McCann
Brad Knowles wrote: I've been looking at the requirements and potential performance you can get with Lyris ListManager, MailEngine, etc See and for the respe

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Translation F'up2 => Reply-To

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Is really no developer able to answer this?? Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31.01.04: > Hi, > anybody here who could deliver Python code for the following? > In news2mail direction, I'd like to "translate" the F'up2 header > (containing one or more newsgroups) to the Reply-To: