On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:31:23 +1000
Adam Steer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about CMS independence? An option in MM to say 'leave the
> interface to some other things, and just do the mail and DB
> management'?
There's nothing that mandates you use Mailman's web UI. You're free to
replace it
How about CMS independence? An option in MM to say 'leave the interface
to some other things, and just do the mail and DB management'?
Fil [from rezo.net] - I'm interested in your PHP/Mailman widget - I've
never had any success getting PHP and Python to play together, but them
I don't really expec
Good. But I don`t like zope that much...
f
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:00:05 -0300 (BRT)
> Felipe Fonseca > wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about a full frontend redesign for discussion lists
> > using mailman, perhaps integrated to a CMS like xoops or alike,
> > allowing people to:
>
> ZMailman?
__
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:00:05 -0300 (BRT)
Felipe Fonseca > wrote:
> I was thinking about a full frontend redesign for discussion lists
> using mailman, perhaps integrated to a CMS like xoops or alike,
> allowing people to:
ZMailman?
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate m
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> So you first approve all legitimate emails, get a new legitimate email
> and discard all spam inclusive the last legitimate mail you just got.
>
> Don't really like that idea because of that li'l race...
I agree. From a user interface perspective, t
>2. Alternate user (and admin) interfaces (Ian Bicking)
>3. Re: Alternate user (and admin) interfaces (Fil)
>4. Re: Alternate user (and admin) interfaces (Adam Steer)
>5. Re: Alternate user (and admin) interfaces (Thomas Hochstein)
>6. Relocating a list (Nigel Metheringham)
>
On Jul 18, 2004, at 4:43 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
For Mailman 2.1.5, we find the following update which is mentioned in
the mailman-2.1.5/NEWS file:
- The admindb page has a checkbox that allows you to discard all
held
messages that are marked Defer. On heavy lists with lots of
spa
Hi,
we are encountering the following "problem" with Mailman 2.1.3:
When a subscriber sends a message to one of our lists with an UTF-8
encoded body and CTE "8bit", Mailman obviously recodes the body from
"8bit" to "base64" before distributing the mail to the subscribers of
the respective list.
On Sat, 2004-07-17 16:32:07 -0400, Terri Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jul 17, 2004, at 8:25 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >I'm managing some Mailman based lists and get "some" spam each day.
> >Actually, > 95% of all emails kept for being revised is Spam, and
