Hi,
Anyone cares about 1029275 (Maximum number of members per list) ? This
patch was submitted at sf and here a month ago and still nothing. I
just want to read "we don't want this feature" or "it's a bad patch,
it's needs more work here and there". Kikuchi ?
Thank you for keep contributors motiv
At 10:29 AM +0900 2004-10-17, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
While we're at it, can we update the documentation so that we can
deprecate FAQ entries 5.8 and 5.12? It sure would be nice to not have
so many people asking about support questions with Mailman 2.1.5 using
older versions of Python, or MTA
Also, if we're going to require VERP support on the MTA with 2.1.5
and beyond, can we go ahead and turn on "VERP_CONFIRMATIONS = Yes" in
mm_cfg.py, so that we can also eliminate all the questions regarding
the funky subject lines which led to FAQ 4.52?
Sounds reasonable. Anyone against thi
Hi,
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 2:52 PM +0900 2004-10-16, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Here is the diff for current NEWS file. (I believe Barry can
fix my poor English.) More will come later because I get requests
of merging patches personally. But, please be patient as I will
check the patches and bugs for
rchives/private/listes/attachments/20041016/3557b8e1/villaasen.jpg___
The underscores are the signature's first line
Assuming the signature is of list footer, I've done every effort to
separate lines with '\n'. See Scrubber.py and Decorat
On 10/15/2004 22:52, "Tokio Kikuchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I want to ask 'nimda.txt' in the tests/msgs directory is of
> any use in the mailman source code. None of the test scripts refer
> to this file. I even did "find . | xargs grep nimda" only to get
> "Binary file ./tests/msgs ma
I've just tried the scrubber, and Apple's Mail does a bad job parsing the
message's scrubbed URL (that is followed with the signature), so the hits
went to
Oct 16 15:02:44 2004 (29099) Private archive file not found:
/var/local/mailman/archives/private/listes/attachments/20
Are you sure you checked out Release_2_1-maint ? Command should be
% cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/mailman\
co -r Release_2_1-maint mailman
Fil wrote:
I've just upgraded my system to CVS, and I get this:
Oct 16 11:26:36 2004 (19525) Uncaught runner exception: 'str' object has no
> I've just upgraded my system to CVS, and I get this:
>
> Oct 16 11:26:36 2004 (19525) Uncaught runner exception: 'str' object has no
> attribute 'get_sender'
> Oct 16 11:26:36 2004 (19525) Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/var/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 111, in _one
I've just upgraded my system to CVS, and I get this:
Oct 16 11:26:36 2004 (19525) Uncaught runner exception: 'str' object has no
attribute 'get_sender'
Oct 16 11:26:36 2004 (19525) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 111, in _oneloop
sel
Hi,
there is something really nasty about the way postfix chooses its UID/GID
(recall: it's based on the UID of the alias file where the alias has been
taken from).
So if you have a somewhat complex configuration, you can have postfix invoke
the mailman command from two different aliases files (/
11 matches
Mail list logo
