On 1/21/2005 14:06, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John W. Baxter wrote:
>>
>> A quick grep in the source didn't reveal a case where Mailman attempts to
>> send mail to the unqualified recipient . Does anyone happen
>> to know where it is?
>
> I don't know, but is it possible that '
hi there,
i have newly subscribed to the list as i want to propose an alternative
(extended) postfix MTA backend. i called it PostfixVirtual.py as a working
title.
it enables an extended support for postfix virtual domains. all this can also
be achieved by manually adding some aliases in postf
John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>A quick grep in the source didn't reveal a case where Mailman attempts to
>send mail to the unqualified recipient . Does anyone happen
>to know where it is?
I don't know, but is it possible that 'owner' or 'moderator' for some
list - maybe the site (mailman) list - is set
I haven't really been following this thread, but I hope you meant that
the new format will be:
Subject: [prefix] testing
..and replies will be modified to look like:
Subject: [prefix] Re: testing
instead of the current:
Subject: Re: [prefix] testing
It will be the site administrator's choice.
If
I haven't really been following this thread, but I hope you meant that the new
format will be:
Subject: [prefix] testing
..and replies will be modified to look like:
Subject: [prefix] Re: testing
instead of the current:
Subject: Re: [prefix] testing
If you meant something else, please explain. Th
I think I can add some code before the 2.1.6 final release to exchage
Re: and prefix order for the subject prefix without numbering. (Yes, we
now have a nice feature to add numbering in the subject prefix.)
Or avoid messing with the Subject in the first place if the tag is
already there? Sound
think I can add some code before the 2.1.6 final release to exchage
Re: and prefix order for the subject prefix without numbering. (Yes, we
now have a nice feature to add numbering in the subject prefix.)
Can you do the same for "AW" and some of the other non-English forms of
"Re"? I'm only aski
OK, that subject might hit a filter somewhere. ;-)
Mark Shapiro wrote in another thread, in mailman-users:
If you haven't changed SMTP_LOG_EACH_FAILURE in mm_cfg.py,
the 3 failures should be logged in Mailman's smtp-failure log.
Which prompted me to look there, and find
Jan 18 14:47:56 2005 (2
On 1/21/2005 5:54, "Tokio Kikuchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> think I can add some code before the 2.1.6 final release to exchage
> Re: and prefix order for the subject prefix without numbering. (Yes, we
> now have a nice feature to add numbering in the subject prefix.)
Can you do the same for
Niels Bakker wrote:
Hello,
http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html
Mailman 2.1.6b1 breaks this algorithm, specifically this step:
| Only two things need to be done with the subject strings: ask whether
| they begin with `Re:', and compare the non-Re parts for equivalence.
| So you can get away wit
At 6:55 PM -0800 2005-01-20, Mark Sapiro wrote:
First is all text entered via the web admin interface is HTML escaped
resulting in the <, etc.
To avoid this, set the text for member_moderation_notice using
bin/config_list instead of using the web interface.
Blargh. The goal was to give us som
11 matches
Mail list logo
