On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:18:28PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
> >> - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
> >> document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
>
> > This is *not* a positive move.
>
> I'll mildly disagree if the installation ball inclu
PS - Tokio: I've got a pile of patches for the in-line documentation of
the stuff in bin/ that I need to double-check and submit. Will there be
any problem if I check them in now? I can wait if it makes your life
easier.
No problem! Thanks.
--
Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp
http://
J C Lawrence wrote:
Do note that LaTeX and TeX is a plain text format and is quite human
readable, even more so than say [nrt]roff.
For some definition of "readable" ;-) though I would probably agree that it's
moreso than *roff.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Jan 26, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:39, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I have to agree. Doesn't it make more sense to move to something like
reStructuredText if you need to produce somewhat nice-looking web or
printed documents without much effort?
I think the do
Hi,
Before some one 'fifth' this, I should say:
The plain text version mailman-install is already in the tar ball --
admin/www/mailman-install.txt. What is missing is the pointer.
Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On January 26, 2005 08:36:55 -0500 Bob Puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I third the motion. I h
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:03:51 -0800
Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will take this back *slightly* in the case of mailman: since it's
> designed to work with a webserver, you're obviously installing it
> where the docs are actually viewable (at least if they're html, does
> anyone actuall
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:32:06 -0800
Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
>> document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
> This is *not* a positive move.
I'll mildly disagree if the
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:39, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I have to agree. Doesn't it make more sense to move to something like
> reStructuredText if you need to produce somewhat nice-looking web or
> printed documents without much effort?
I think the doc source doesn't make much of a difference
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 01:32, Alan Batie wrote:
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
> > - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
> > document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
>
> This is *not* a positive move. Installation instructions should be in
--On January 26, 2005 08:36:55 -0500 Bob Puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I third the motion. I hate it when the docs for something are in
something other than plain text. I rarely am logged in with a gui -
always a terminal mode, and even html can get goofy.
Bob
I fourth it. I don't even know if
I third the motion. I hate it when the docs for something are in something
other than plain text. I rarely am logged in with a gui - always a terminal
mode, and even html can get goofy.
Bob
-- Original Message ---
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alan Batie <
> "Alan" == Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a
>> latex document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for
>> details.
Alan> This is *not* a positive move. Installation in
12 matches
Mail list logo
