[Mailman-Developers] SMTPDeliver.py still can't do MTA VERP?

2005-02-17 Thread Dan Mick
a long long *long* time ago now, I made a small hack to SMTPDeliver.py to add options to the sendmail connection EHLO, to enable VERP generation in the MTA (so that the sending system didn't have to send N messages to the MTA to accomplish VERP, but rather let the MTA deal with it). For Postfi

[Mailman-Developers] Fwd: [NOSI discussion] Same planet, different worlds

2005-02-17 Thread Tobias Eigen
As promised - a message I posted this morning to the Nonprofit Open Source Initiative discussion list (see http://www.nosi.net for details on NOSI). Let me know, perhaps off-list if this discussion is starting to seem a bit off-topic, if you are interested in getting involved in this. Chec

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] How to get Sender Id from the Mailing List where the annoymous option is set

2005-02-17 Thread Brad Knowles
At 3:57 AM -0800 2005-02-08, vijayan p wrote: Can anyone tell me how to obtain the statistics of which member has posted how many messages. I think you'd have to look at the incoming messages in the MTA logs, before they get handed off to Mailman. But keep in mind that Mailman does not have a

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Tobias Eigen
Dear friends, I had *no idea* my post was going to generate this level of response. Thank you all. I'm simply fascinated by the dynamics in the group, inspired by your generosity, and eager to help out in any way I can. Let me make a few brief points, then forward another message I just sent to

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 14:54, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Perhaps I missed this thread, but what standards are there? Link to doc? http://barry.warsaw.us/software/STYLEGUIDE.txt -Barry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps I missed this thread, but what standards are there? Link to doc? Barry Warsaw wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:22, Adrian Bye wrote: And, I just talked with my developer, and he got quite upset about the idea of fixing his code to conform to your coding style. So I guess that won't be pos

Re: [Mailman-Developers] new on list.

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:59, Maat wrote: > first i'm wondering : the cvs tree @sourceforge seems to be out of > date... have i smoked something too stong for me or am i right ? The CVS tree on SF is the canonical tree, but remember that you want to work on the Release_2_1-maint branch, which is

[Mailman-Developers] new on list.

2005-02-17 Thread Maat
hi all, I'm new on this list. hope i will be able to help (little and very humble patches). first i'm wondering : the cvs tree @sourceforge seems to be out of date... have i smoked something too stong for me or am i right ? if i'm right where is the true tree please ? grtx Pascal -- Pascal Vilare

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:22, Adrian Bye wrote: > And, I just talked with my developer, and he got quite upset about the idea of > fixing his code to conform to your coding style. So I guess that won't be > possible for now. I certainly understand why you have coding guidelines, I > agree they ar

[Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.6b4

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
Okay, I've pushed the 2.1.6b4 tarball out to SourceForge (now that file uploads are working again ;). I will likely be off-line until Tuesday. -Barry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Mailman-Developers mailing li

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Adrian Bye
> We need to put a freeze on new features for 2.1.6. In fact, > I think we should freeze all checkins except show-stopping > bug fixes. I'd like to take between now and the end of > February for testing. And, I just talked with my developer, and he got quite upset about the idea of fixing his

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:15:44 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > I plan on installing the current 2.1.6 > on my various sites and I hope others can do the same thing to help test > 2.1.6 in order to get an end-of-February release. I'm willing to install the pending beta 4 if it

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 12:15, Barry Warsaw wrote: > We need to put a freeze on new features for 2.1.6. In fact, I think we > should freeze all checkins except show-stopping bug fixes. I'd like to > take between now and the end of February for testing. Oh yes, and for all i18n champions to finish

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 09:33, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > I looked through your code and my feeling is not integrating this patch > in 2.1.6. We need to put a freeze on new features for 2.1.6. In fact, I think we should freeze all checkins except show-stopping bug fixes. I'd like to take between now

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Sorry I'm responding late. We had presentations of master theses and I had to look after 3 out of 8 students for qualification. Moreover, 2 students are Chinese and difficulty in expressing themselves in Japanese. (Like myself in English :-( ) Adrian Bye wrote: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] from field with real name

2005-02-17 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Mark Sapiro wrote: Stefan Hofmeir wrote: the sender (from field) of a newsletter list should be the address of the list (anonymous_list = yes). previous from field (of the test list "mailman"): From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How it is possible to sent also a real name like From: "list ABC <[EMAIL PROT

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] How to get the sender id when the list is set to annoymous mode

2005-02-17 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Brad Knowles wrote: At 3:06 AM -0800 2005-02-15, vijayan p wrote: I would like to know if as a administrator, is there a way i can get the senders email id for the messages posted. If you have access to the server logs, you can track them by message-id. It should be easy to track the o