> "Joseph" == Joseph Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> Finally, I'd like some discussion of licensing. I think
Joseph> that the xmlrpc.py file itself should be LGPL just so that
Joseph> there is no ambiguity whatsoever about using XML-RPC calls
Joseph> from a non-GPL ap
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> Similarly, I can't mess with the current installation in order to make the
> new one build. I have to make a new build, test it, then deploy it. If
> deployment takes a couple of minutes to take down the service, move some
> links, t
I've created a patch to Mailman to add XML-RPC based remote procedure
calls to mailman. This is just a first cut to show that it can be
done and to do a few basic operations I need to plug it into a kind of
hosting framework so it can be controlled from a separate web server.
I plan to add functi
--On 21 July 2005 15:32:14 +0100 Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, blimey. Everything seems hunky-dory now. Thanks, Barry!
Ah, I spoke too soon.
If I build with --prefix=foo where foo is an empty directory, then
everything is OK.
If foo is /local/mailman (my operational locat
--On 20 July 2005 14:57:26 -0400 Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 12:16, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>> Am I right in thinking this means that I need to downgrade my python
>> version to make this work?
>
> No, but apparently does mean that you'll have to rebuild the code
--On 21 July 2005 05:32:43 +0900 Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 12:16, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am I right in thinking this means that I need to downgrade my python
>>> version to make this work?
>>
>>
>> No, but apparently does mea
