Re: [Mailman-Developers] Serious Archiving problem in 2.1.7

2006-01-04 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
> At my first glance, it will only work for english lists in which the > replace parameter _(' at ') is the same both in unicode and ascii. > > I'll try to test and generate i18n patch today. > Done. I'll commit it in the CVS if no problems. I really hate to read code in the Archiver director

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Serious Archiving problem in 2.1.7

2006-01-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >At my first glance, it will only work for english lists in which the >replace parameter _(' at ') is the same both in unicode and ascii. > >I'll try to test and generate i18n patch today. I see the point. Unfortunately I only tested English and French and in French, _(' at

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Serious Archiving problem in 2.1.7

2006-01-04 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 08:58 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > >>The purpose of this post is twofold. First, I would like independent >>review of the patch, as I still don't fully understand the reason for >>the error in all cases and the i18n implications. > > > I'll try to fi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Serious Archiving problem in 2.1.7

2006-01-04 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >> >>>The purpose of this post is twofold. First, I would like independent >>>review of the patch, as I still don't fully understand the reason for >>>the error in all cases and the i18n implications. >> >> >>I'll try to find some time to do this, if Tokio doesn't get to it fir

[Mailman-Developers] subscription_cancel in Cgi/confirm.py lacks SIGTERM parachute

2006-01-04 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Hi, I noticed that in 2.1.6, subscription_cancel in Mailman/Cgi/confirm.py doesn't have the same SIGTERM unlocking parachute that subscription_confirm has; is this done on purpose, and why? Is there no risk of leaving a stale lock with what subscription_cancel does? Without more info, I'd say thi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Serious Archiving problem in 2.1.7

2006-01-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 08:58 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > The purpose of this post is twofold. First, I would like independent > review of the patch, as I still don't fully understand the reason for > the error in all cases and the i18n implications. I'll try to find some time to do this, if Tokio

[Mailman-Developers] Serious Archiving problem in 2.1.7

2006-01-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
There is a potentially serious archiving problem in 2.1.7 involving a UnicodeError when obscuring email addresses in the body of posts destined for the .txt file. The problem is reported at and was also rep

[Mailman-Developers] preferred documentation format, sources for documentation in admin/www

2006-01-04 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi, I'd like to document my patch for making Mailman OpenPGP and S/MIME aware ( http://non-gnu.uvt.nl/pub/mailman/ ). I'd like this documentation to integrate nicely with the official Mailman documenation. What is the preferred format for creating documentation? I believe it's LaTeX. However,