[Mailman-Developers] Scrubber mungs quoted-printable revisited.

To refresh, see and . The problem with set_payload() creating a message for which a subsequent get_payload did 'too much' decoding was fix

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change toHandlers/SpamDetect.pyisincomplete

Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> The pass through of the 'hold' action if the message is to -owner seems >> right to me, but discarding instead of rejecting a 'reject' action if >> the message is to -owner seems wrong. > >Well, then it should be passed. Rejection makes it another l

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change toHandlers/SpamDetect.py isincomplete

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >>OK, Barry. I've come up with this patch (for the current CVS). >>If its OK, I want to start up for the release of 2.1.8a1. > > > > The pass through of the 'hold' action if the message is to -owner seems > right to me, but discarding instead of reje

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change toHandlers/SpamDetect.py isincomplete

Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >OK, Barry. I've come up with this patch (for the current CVS). >If its OK, I want to start up for the release of 2.1.8a1. The pass through of the 'hold' action if the message is to -owner seems right to me, but discarding instead of rejecting a 'reject' action if the mess

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change to Handlers/SpamDetect.py isincomplete

Barry Warsaw wrote: > That seems right to me. It doesn't make any sense to hold a message > ultimately destined for the list owner or moderator because those are > the people who have to approve the message (what? so they can then read > it again in their inbox?). > > If in response to a certain

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change to Handlers/SpamDetect.py isincomplete

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 14:30 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Actually, as you implicitly point out, this isn't necessary since only > list posts should be in the moderation queue in the first place. The > only other messages that currently get held are messages to the owner > that get caught by a Spam

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change to Handlers/SpamDetect.py isincomplete

Dan Astoorian wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:52:17 PST, Mark Sapiro writes: >> >> Definitely the message received by the user in this case is misleading, >> but the held message if approved will go to the owners/moderators >> only. I think Dan knows this. > >Actually, I didn't. I'm a co-moderato

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-1416853 ] Jan 14 change to Handlers/SpamDetect.py isincomplete

Dan Astoorian posted to the bug tracker: >Specifically: it is (IMHO) probably incorrect to apply >the "Hold" action to messages which were not submitted >to the list address. For example, a message sent to >"listname-owner" and matched by a "Hold" >header_filter_rule should not be held for approv