Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>>We may have to patch against this email package parsedate bug.
>>I've just uploaded a patch on SF tracker. Please someone review this
>>before I commit in the CVS (this weekend, maybe).
>
>
> I have looked at the patch in the tracker.
>
> Caveat:
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>We may have to patch against this email package parsedate bug.
>I've just uploaded a patch on SF tracker. Please someone review this
>before I commit in the CVS (this weekend, maybe).
I have looked at the patch in the tracker.
Caveat: I haven't tested anything - this is
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>>We may have to patch against this email package parsedate bug.
>>I've just uploaded a patch on SF tracker. Please someone review this
>>before I commit in the CVS (this weekend, maybe).
>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=103&atid=30
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>We may have to patch against this email package parsedate bug.
>I've just uploaded a patch on SF tracker. Please someone review this
>before I commit in the CVS (this weekend, maybe).
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=103&atid=300103
Above URI is not cor
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16248/discuss
>> GNU Mailman Large Date Data Denial Of Service Vulnerability
>> GNU Mailman is prone to a denial of service attack. This issue affects
>> the
>> email date parsing functionality of Mailman.
(snip)
>> 06.3.18 CVE: CVE-2005-41
