Hi,
Sorry that I was unable to respond.
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
>> I'd like to use this occasion to drop a maximum of patches we still
>> have:
>> - is 2.1.9 still vulnearble to CVE-2005-3573 ? I didn't found any
>> reference to it in the r
At 8:17 PM -0400 2006-09-11, Pierre-Marc Fournier wrote:
> Here is the patch. I suggest that it be integrated in Mailman, as it
> would enable everyone to use a similar system easily.
If you want this considered for incorporation into Mailman, I would
encourage you to upload it to the Mailman
Hello,
At our site, we have a web page with a form that users fill to request a
new mailing list. If that mailing list gets approved, the admins use
Mailman's create.py to effectively create it.
A trivial patch allows the approval system (or any script) to pass the
list name, owner, etc to create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> I'd like to use this occasion to drop a maximum of patches we still
> have:
> - is 2.1.9 still vulnearble to CVE-2005-3573 ? I didn't found any
> reference to it in the release notes, and the pa
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:52:03AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sep 10, 2006, at 4:25 AM, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> > What revisions contain the patch for CVE-2006-2941?
> > - Fixed denial of service attack which can be caused by some
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 10, 2006, at 4:25 AM, Albert Chin wrote:
> What revisions contain the patch for CVE-2006-2941?
> - Fixed denial of service attack which can be caused by some
> standards-breaking RFC 2231 formatted headers. CVE-2006-2941.
http://svn.sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:40 AM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> So, it appears I'm still running version 2.1.8b1, and I'm doing so
> from
> code checked out of CVS (Tag = NRelease_2_1_8b1, but probably with
> modifications...)
>
> I'd love to be able to do a cv
