--On Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:07 AM -0400 Barry Warsaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or is there some way I'm missing that would allow us to segregate
> some domain traffic to Mailman's LMTP server and other traffic to
> Postfix's standard transports? What about Sendmail?
Shouldn't be an i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 28, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 11:54 PM -0400 9/27/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> Looking at Postfix, what other options are readily available? I
>> suppose you could try to hook into the transport maps, but if I
>> understan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 28, 2006, at 12:15 AM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:54 PM -0400 Barry Warsaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Looking at Postfix, what other options are readily available? I
>> suppose
>> you could try to ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> In summary my preferences would be:
>>
>> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
>> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
>> 2.1.9, so let's ma
At 11:56 PM -0400 9/27/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I'm definitely not proposing to get rid of deliver to program,
> so at worst, Sendmail users will continue to use this method.
> Is there a better way to get the message from Sendmail into
> Mailman's incoming queue?
Well, sendmail does LMTP to
At 11:54 PM -0400 9/27/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Looking at Postfix, what other options are readily available? I
> suppose you could try to hook into the transport maps, but if I
> understand them correctly, you're still talking about forking a
> process per message.
Use LMTP instead. This
--On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:54 PM -0400 Barry Warsaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at Postfix, what other options are readily available? I suppose
> you could try to hook into the transport maps, but if I understand them
> correctly, you're still talking about forking a proce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:34 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 3:04 PM -0400 9/27/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> This appears to allow us to set up true virtual domains without
>> having to encode destination aliases. The trick though is that we
>> would us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:33 PM -0700 9/27/06, Carson Gaspar wrote:
>
>> I love the idea. A fork/exec per message always makes me
>> twitch... I have a
>> feeling it would also provide better fault-tolerance, especia
At 9:34 PM -0500 9/27/06, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Moreover, I'm not keen on Maildir. It makes a lot of trade-offs to
> try to get something that is NFS-safe, and I'm not convinced those
> trade-offs are worthwhile, especially not in a non-NFS environment.
One other problem with Maildir -- it th
At 6:33 PM -0700 9/27/06, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> I love the idea. A fork/exec per message always makes me twitch... I have a
> feeling it would also provide better fault-tolerance, especially in a
> replicated filesystem cluster, where you have clear atomic behaviour at
> your disposal.
I agr
At 3:04 PM -0400 9/27/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> This appears to allow us to set up true virtual domains without
> having to encode destination aliases. The trick though is that we
> would use Maildir delivery for all incoming messages, something I'm
> keen on switching to for Mailman 2.2 anyw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:19 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:09 PM -0400 Barry Warsaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm not up on the development/release plans of RHEL. When do you
>> think they might release a versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
>> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
>> 2.1.9, so let's make it official.
>
> Would it be poss
--On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:09 PM -0400 Barry Warsaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not up on the development/release plans of RHEL. When do you
> think they might release a version with Python 2.4 support? The same
> kind of goes for OS X, which ships with Python 2.3 on Tiger. I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:54 AM -0400 Barry Warsaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Then there is the question of what versions we support for Mailman
>> 2.2, which is currently under de
--On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:04 PM -0400 Barry Warsaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to know what you think about updating our Postfix virtual
> delivery hooks to use this technique, and about making Maildir
> delivery the default. We'd keep the old way around for MTAs that
> don'
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Mailman 2.2 supported on Python 2.4 and 2.5.
+1.
> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
> 2.1.9, so let's make it official.
Would it be possible to maintain a rough li
--On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:54 AM -0400 Barry Warsaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then there is the question of what versions we support for Mailman
> 2.2, which is currently under development. Previously we've said
> we'll support Python 2.3 but I think we should revisit that decision
> In summary my preferences would be:
>
> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
> 2.1.9, so let's make it official.
>
> Mailman 2.2 supported on Python 2.4 and 2.5.
+1
--
Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:51 AM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> This of course begs the questions of how mailman distinguishes between
> the lists (what's the appropriate argument to the mailman binary, and
> whether there are any characters besides "." that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm including mailman-developers on this message, because I want to
discuss the issue of which Python versions to support.
On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Stubbs Jeff wrote:
> Got a question. I picked up another Mac, so I'm going to rebuild my
> list
22 matches
Mail list logo
