Re: [Mailman-Developers] Crypto-sign to post

2006-11-13 Thread Stefan Schlott
Hi, >>> I suppose you could also have each mailing list publish a pubkey and >>> require that messages be encrypted with that pubkey in order to get >>> posted. > Now there's something which I'm sure it's a small subset of people would > be interested in, but it would definitely be nice.. the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Crypto-sign to post

2006-11-13 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 11 November 2006 23:03:52 -0500 Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suppose you could also have each mailing list publish a pubkey and > require that messages be encrypted with that pubkey in order to get > posted. Of course that increases the cycles involved on both ends, > but

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Crypto-sign to post

2006-11-13 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 13, 2006, at 2:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Barry Warsaw writes: > >> I suppose you could also have each mailing list publish a pubkey and >> require that messages be encrypted with that pubkey in order to get >> posted. > > Hey, that's gr

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-checkins] SF.net SVN: mailman: [8090] trunk/mailman/Mailman

2006-11-13 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi Barry, > >>> E.g. when I try to use r8090 via the Apache ScriptAlias path, I end >>> up getting three slashes between the host and the 'mailman' prefix. >> Oops, I'll try restore ScriptAlias. > > Cool, thanks. I may commit a few changes in this area, but I'll try > not to mess you up too mu