Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> 5.85 million messages
> That's 0.03% if you count all the messages. It is 0.008% if you
> discard the top three offenders, all of which I have contacted.
I'd say that's a strong argument for just using the Message-ID and
simplifying this tremendously...
...Barry, do yo
> What we really want to know is how many (non-empty) Message-ID
> collisions are there that *don't* share a Date? This is the number of
> messages that only-messageid loses, and that the composite identifier
> method would not lose.
I took a look at a larger dataset, 5.85 million messages from s
