--On 4 March 2008 17:08:52 -0800 Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the former, then you must object to DSNs
from MTAs as well. If the latter, that is planned to be addressed in
Mailman 2.2.
Of course we object to DSNs from MTAs. No shipping mailserver
currently sends DSNs to accepted
yOn Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Ethan Fremen wrote:
Barry said in an earlier message that there's no web UI for mm3: my
first impulse is to start on something there.
I'm interested in working on a REST-style interface for controlling
Mailman. One thought: should the web UI be
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the
master copy now? The LaTeX source for the docs isn't in the Bazaar
repository, beyond a copy in the Japanese translation
(./messages/ja/doc/mailman-member.tex). The wiki page at
On 5-Mar-08, at 2:53 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the
master copy now? The LaTeX source for the docs isn't in the Bazaar
repository, beyond a copy in the Japanese translation
(./messages/ja/doc/mailman-member.tex). The wiki page at
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:53:21PM -0500, Terri Oda wrote:
The master latex file is probably the one on my hard drive/checked
into source control (uhh, it was in svn, but it might not have made
it to bazaar, in which case, that's my bad and I'll see what I can
do), ...
Thanks! Looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 2:53 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the
master copy now?
Hi Andrew,
The masters are in Bazaar but they're not in the main code
repository. I split them off, along with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Terri Oda wrote:
I should probably finish writing the docs, but I'm currently hampered
by a cyst in my right hand that makes it fairly hard to type right
now, so it's kinda limited my ability to participate in much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:36 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Ethan Fremen wrote:
Barry said in an earlier message that there's no web UI for mm3: my
first impulse is to start on something there.
I'm interested in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Cristóbal Palmer writes:
Even without the original message text a response is a problem.
I agree -- the addresses are too easy to compute and do end up in
lists that are sold -- and would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 4, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:28:22PM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
The Defaults.py setting for DEFAULT_GENERIC_NONMEMBER_ACTION has been
Hold from the beginning.
We've recently set this to 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:33 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
The one reason that I'm looking for an alternative to Mailman is the
lack
of adequate integration with MTAs, which means that there is no
sensible
thing that I can do with suspected spam. What I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 2, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Dan MacNeil wrote:
However, lots of people use it for newsletters/announcements
because it is the tool at hand. Adding things like 1-click
unsubscribe will make mailman a better tool for these accidental
uses and (as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 2, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Then my next question is do you have experience with lists that do
implement a 1-click unsubscribe, and do you find it actually works? My
experience (see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:31:03PM -0500, Dan MacNeil wrote:
Since 2005, things have gotten a bit more ruthless on the
anti-spam front, Particularly at the large providers so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I realize that I've been remiss in announcing this. My apologies.
I have been awarded the 2008 Pizzigati Prize for Public Interest
Computing for GNU Mailman.
http://www.pizzigatiprize.org/
I am deeply honored to win this prize because I believe
On 4-Mar-08, at 11:15 AM, Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
IMHO, moving the unsubscribe or edit options to the top of the
listinfo page or making it its own page by default would go a long way
towards alleviating this problem.
+1
Most of my problems went away when I changed it so unsubscribe was
on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Terri Oda wrote:
| We actually
| already have a separate page, that's just not linked: try looking at
| the options page without an email address and it's almost exactly
| what users would probably want:
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Any objections to changing the URL in the RFC 2369 List-Unsubscribe:
header to the above - for 2.1.10? I could probably also suppress the
Error: No address given message unless you came from options
18 matches
Mail list logo
