On Aug 10, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Grover wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Barry Warsaw
wrote:
On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
My concern is to not create additional 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3 migration
headaches. If this is something that could ease the migration to
MM 3
by
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> My concern is to not create additional 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3 migration
>> headaches. If this is something that could ease the migration to MM 3
>> by providing a 'stepwise' path, that would be gr
On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
My concern is to not create additional 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3 migration
headaches. If this is something that could ease the migration to MM 3
by providing a 'stepwise' path, that would be great. However, if it is
viewed as something that will be done for
On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Jordan Hayes wrote:
Barry Warsaw writes:
Mailman 3 will include a couple of Python web servers.
Sorry, my port 80 is already taken up by something else :-)
Web servers can bind to other ports. They can even be proxied :).
There will definitely be a web serve
Barry Warsaw writes:
Mailman 3 will include a couple of Python web servers.
Sorry, my port 80 is already taken up by something else :-)
There will definitely be a web server for the REST interface and the
web ui will likely be vended from a Python web server. They're super
easy to write!
Andrew Grover wrote:
>
>So the next question for Mark and everyone is: do you want a
>StormDB-backed MembershipAdaptor for Mailman 2.x?
>
>There are some further questions the Systers org needs to settle
>before proceeding, about the ownership status of GSOC-produced code,
>as well as if copyright
On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Barry Warsaw quoted:
On Aug 8, 2009, at 4:25 AM, Malveeka Tewari wrote:
I also want to make sure that in the database I am caturing all the
Memberships data. Presently my database uses the following class as
a storm
abstraction for the databas
Barry Warsaw quoted:
>
>On Aug 8, 2009, at 4:25 AM, Malveeka Tewari wrote:
>
>> I also want to make sure that in the database I am caturing all the
>> Memberships data. Presently my database uses the following class as
>> a storm
>> abstraction for the database. Do I need to add/remove anything?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 13:06 +0100, Adam McGreggor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Bernd 'Siggy' Brentrup wrote:
> > You might contribute some shell scripts simulating old behavior,
> > a Debian package would then ask an additional debconf question
> > whether to install these c
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Bernd 'Siggy' Brentrup wrote:
> Sorry Adam for hijacking, I'm not subscribed to mm-users.
no prob!
> > Would it too much to ask for the 'old' (read 'current') scripts/commands
> > to be aliased: at least in the first few releases?
> >
> > e.g., for '
10 matches
Mail list logo
