Tanstaafl writes:
> A really dumb question - is there no way to (reliably, or even at all?)
> 'interact' with just the headers of messages that are attached?
Yes, there is. It's called a "MIME digest", and Mailman already
provides that feature as a subscriber option. This gives the
receiving
Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>A really dumb question - is there no way to (reliably, or even at all?)
>'interact' with just the headers of messages that are attached? Ie,
>consider an HTML digest, with the individual messages as attachments,
>with mailto: hyperlinks in the digest *body* that interact with th
On 2010-02-24 1:41 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> The problem that you are not acknowledging is that generating HTML
> is *not* the problem (although turning it into a user-modifiable
> template might not be easy, especially if you want to have reasonable
> reply-to features). It's what happens
On 2010-02-24 9:12 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I am on the daw-mac (digital audio workstation) mailing list at
> yahoogroups. They do a not horrible job of sending out HTML
> digests. I will try to put a copy of such a message up on the wiki
> after sanitizing it so we can look at how they do it.
Ex
Tom Gafford wrote:
>With reference to:
>http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2005-February/017850.html
>
>It doesn't appear that Adrian bye's fix ever made it into the Mailman code
>base, and now the links to the patch are broken.
The sourceforge link in the above message is sti
With reference to:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2005-February/017850.html
It doesn't appear that Adrian bye's fix ever made it into the Mailman code
base, and now the links to the patch are broken. Does anyone know where to
find his patches and whether they work on any n
Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>How does MM generate the two digests it supports now? Does it store the
>individual messages in some temporary location until it is time to
>generate the digest, then do whatever it does to generate it? Or does it
>process each message as it comes in, and cumulatively add them u
On Feb 23, 2010, at 01:24 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>The point I'm getting at is, I'd like to see the basic framework for a
>new HTML digest added to MM. Barry said he is fine with it as long as it
>is done right, and Mark seems to concur.
Note that this "basic framework" may be something as simple as
Just a quick follow up. I am on the daw-mac (digital audio workstation)
mailing list at yahoogroups. They do a not horrible job of sending out HTML
digests. I will try to put a copy of such a message up on the wiki after
sanitizing it so we can look at how they do it.
-Barry
signature.asc
Des
