Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 04, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >Adam McGreggor wrote: > >>On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 11:12:04AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> >>> Is it? Aren't most open source discussion lists generally open membership >>> (perhaps with initial moderation)? >> >>I'm not quite sure I go as far a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Adam McGreggor wrote: >On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 11:12:04AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> >> Is it? Aren't most open source discussion lists generally open membership >> (perhaps with initial moderation)? > >I'm not quite sure I go as far as >Ian, in requiring approval, but certainly to require co

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ian Eiloart wrote: > >--On 4 June 2010 11:12:04 -0400 Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> Is it? Aren't most open source discussion lists generally open membership >> (perhaps with initial moderation)? > >Well, maybe, but I've had to switch on approval for various lists because >of subscribing spammers.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 4 June 2010 11:12:04 -0400 Barry Warsaw wrote: On Jun 04, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: 2. Admin ability to create/delete lists via pre-defined styles Note that in my current thinking, it is the site admin who can create styles. Right, but it would be nice if Mailman cam

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 11:12:04AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jun 04, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > >These days, I guess that requiring approval for membership should be the > >default, so that should be part of any shipping style. > > Is it? Aren't most open source discussion lis

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 04, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: >>>2. Admin ability to create/delete lists via pre-defined styles >> >> Note that in my current thinking, it is the site admin who can create >> styles. > >Right, but it would be nice if Mailman came with some styles out of the >box. At least,

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 04, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Anna Granudd wrote: >there are some mock-ups on the wiki (see >http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Web+UI+Mockups) but it'd be great if you >could help with ideas for a nice design and layout! Martin's a rock star, so I'm sure he'll come up with some really nice stuff.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 03, 2010, at 04:37 PM, Richard Leland wrote: >Django's handling of i18n/l10n is well done. You could also use something >like Transifex to encourage contributions in various langs. > >http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/i18n/#topics-i18n >http://www.transifex.net/ We'll probably en

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Martin Albisetti
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Anna Granudd wrote: > my name is Anna and I'm participating in GSoC for Systers where my project > this summer is to develop a new UI for Mailman 3.0 as well as a UI extension > for Systers who are running a customized version of Mailman. Hi Anna! It's great to se

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 3 June 2010 14:20:25 -0400 Barry Warsaw wrote: 2. Admin ability to create/delete lists via pre-defined styles Note that in my current thinking, it is the site admin who can create styles. Right, but it would be nice if Mailman came with some styles out of the box. At least, a "cl

Re: [Mailman-Developers] UI for Mailman 3.0 update

2010-06-04 Thread Anna Granudd
Hi, there are some mock-ups on the wiki (see http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Web+UI+Mockups) but it'd be great if you could help with ideas for a nice design and layout! Thanks, Anna On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Martin Albisetti wrote: > Hi Anna! > > It's great to see this happening. > Do yo