[Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-10-30 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Patrick Ben Koetter writes: > X-Mailman-Approved-At > lose the X-prefix > Modify to: List-Approved-Date > Next Step: Create RFC or Extend RFC 2369? New RFC. Once you get to the RFC stage, you don't modify them (even for typos, they publish errata). > X-Topics > This co

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-10-30 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Murray S. Kucherawy : > > -Original Message- > > From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org > > [mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org] On Behalf > > Of Patrick Ben Koetter > > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 12:04 PM > > To: Mailman Developers

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-10-30 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
> -Original Message- > From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org > [mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org] On Behalf Of > Patrick Ben Koetter > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 12:04 PM > To: Mailman Developers > Subject: [Mailman-Developers] Mai

[Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-10-30 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
I've created a list to sum up the current discussion/threads on the mailman header work. The list is separated in four sections: I. CLARIFY Needs discussion. II. MODIFY Needs to be registered with IETF or changes X- name. III. KEEP Do not change VI. DELETE Remove from M