Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-11-03 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
> -Original Message- > From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org > [mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org] On Behalf Of > Mark Sapiro > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 2:57 PM > To: mailman-developers@python.org > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Devel

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-11-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 02, 2011, at 11:14 AM, C Nulk wrote: >I agree with having a List-Archive-Sent header for when the message is >sent to one (or more archivers). However, I still think there is a need >for the date and time when the List actually receives the message. I agree, but I think Mailman should be

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman headers roundup

2011-11-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 02, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Chris Clark wrote: >If a header is going to contain data that is generated from non-trivial >processing I think it would be good form to include the algorithm name in the >header. The idea behind the header is to enhance RFC 5064 so that the MLM can pre-calculate Arc