On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>> archivers are configured site-wide, so there's almost nothing
>> to expose in the web-ui.
>
> I'm worried about confusion.
Indeed. I think Barry misspoke here. But remember, we're barely out
of alpha test, and we don't actually have a
On Mar 26, 2012, at 06:07 PM, David Jeske wrote:
>I highly recommend reconsidering this and including a standard archiver
>with mailman. If the number of sites that use pipermail is any indication,
>I think failing to include something will basically mean lots of lists
>without any archives.
I th
On Mar 26, 2012, at 05:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>We'd love to have work done on the archier! I know that we're ditching
>pipermail entirely and that archivers are becoming separate from the core
>mailman. What I don't know is whether mailman3 will eventually have
>a standard archiver which
On Mar 27, 2012, at 08:53 AM, David Jeske wrote:
>Storm-ORM looks like it allows any primary key so that's good. From a quick
>glance it looks very similar to the Clearsilver-odb-orm in syntax and
>function. My primary beef with django-orm (last time I looked at it) was it
>requiring a unique-id p
On Mar 27, 2012, at 09:32 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Well, for the official poop you'll have to wait for Barry, but AFAICS
>archivers aren't restricted to Storm + RESTish (which is what Mailman itself
>uses) because they're separate applications. If the archiver/web UI is going
>to be distri
On Mar 27, 2012, at 01:29 PM, Terri Oda wrote:
>So Postorius (the webUI) has a sketch of an auth system using BrowserID at
>the moment. BrowserID is convenient 'cause it proves you have ownership of a
>given email address, but we should have OpenID working soon once we've got
>the code to confirm
On Mar 26, 2012, at 10:37 PM, David Jeske wrote:
>Yes. My CSLA code is on the table for MM2 or 3. It's python, and it's BSD.
>More than that, if you folks want it, I'm happy to retool/rewrite it as
>needed to make it suitable. (it has lots of great features, but i havn't
>touched it in a long time
On Mar 27, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Pipermail is going the way of the dodo, yes, but there will be something
>bundled with Mailman, I'm pretty sure.
fsvo "bundled" :)
>(1) the communication from Mailman to the archivers will be via
>LMTP/SMTP, including a Mailman-specific h
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Terri Oda wrote:
>> Looks like archiver for mm3 is still in development stage. As far as I
>> understand searcher depends on the srchiver, right? Not completely but it
>> somewhat depends on archiver. I am not sure if searcher can be implemented
>> without archive
What is the incantation for enabling an external archiving service?
Currently I only see this in mailman.cfg after following 5 minute guide.
[runner.archive]
class: mailman.runners.archive.ArchiveRunner
> archivers are configured site-wide, so there's almost nothing
> to expose in the web-ui.
I'
On Mar 26, 2012, at 03:20 PM, David Jeske wrote:
>I'm writing to find out the state of and philosophy surrounding pipermail
>in mailman, to see if there is a productive way to provide some
>code/development-time to that part of mailman.
That's awesome. Pipermail (in its current state) is ancient
On Mar 27, 2012, at 09:09 PM, Alexander Sulfrian wrote:
>What are the next steps you would propose. I unfortunately not up to
>date with the development of mailman 3. But I am a little bit familiar
>with the mailman 2 source code.
MM3 will be a better platform to build something like the NNTP acc
On 03/26/2012 11:37 PM, David Jeske wrote:
CSLA doesn't currently have any concept server-auth. The only stateful
features it has are view-preferences and read-state, neither of which are
important enough to require a password. It uses a password-less system
which uses cookies for prefs and a 're
Hi,
I would like to participate at the google summer of code this year for
mailman. While reading through the ideas in the wiki, the NNTP archive
access look very interesting.
I took part in the gsoc last year for vlc, developing a c library for
accessing a sony minidisc player from linux. This
On 03/27/2012 03:31 AM, Shayan Md wrote:
I was working on mm3. But systers' indexer/searcher was implemented for
mailman2. So it must be easy for to integrate it with mm2.
Actually, the systers indexer was designed to work with mboxes (because
I had a pile of data in that format that the stud
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:01:41PM +0530, Shayan Md wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Is this integration to be done with mailman2 or mailman3?
>
> In mailman3, the archivers are separated from the mailman core.
>
> I was working on mm3. But systers
On Mar 27, 2012 5:32 AM, "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> If the archiver/web UI is going to be distributed
> *with* Mailman, Barry would probably prefer
> Storm + Django because that's what
> Mailman/Protorius (core and admin web UI, resp.) are
> using. But I imagine that's negotiable as long as
>
On Mar 26, 2012, at 08:03 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> Should it provide exactly the same command line interface?
Not necessarily. Looking at the code now I think the long options are
probably fine, but I'm not sure the short options are great (e.g. -o is
usually reserved for output to a file; no
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Jeske wrote:
> Can you share something about dependency philosophy (besides licensing) in
> Mailman?
Well, for the official poop you'll have to wait for Barry, but AFAICS archivers
aren't restricted to Storm + RESTish (which is what Mailman itself uses)
bec
I brought up a quick CSLA injest of some mailman-dev posts to show off some
basic features. I'm having a little trouble with the swish-e code, so the
features that depend on text-indexing arn't working at the moment (search,
author search). The current UI uses user-cookies to choose between a
2-pa
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0530, Shayan Md wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am Shayan, I am doing my masters from IISc Bangalore. I want to take
> part
> > in GSoC from mailman organization. I have fairly good experience in
> python.
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
