Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Re: GSoC Updates

2013-08-22 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 08/22/2013 02:45 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 16, 2013, at 03:12 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > >> 2) RSA or DSA keys? >> >> DSA can only be used for signing but is faster than RSA, although for >> now our scope is limited to signing later on we "will" add encryption so >> I think we should stic

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Some Doubts for GSoC Project

2013-08-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >larsi is also the mad genius responsible for most of gmane.org, for >which many of us are very grateful :) I hope at some point we'll have a plugin to allow for direct integration with Gmane (e.g. register-this-list, an IArchiver to feed i

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Re: GSoC Updates

2013-08-22 Thread Abhilash Raj
On Friday 23 August 2013 01:57 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 23, 2013, at 01:51 AM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > >> I actually don't have the remember the count but some 10 or so doctests >> were failing. > > If possible, you can just ignore these for now. Let's take a more detailed > look when I la

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Re: GSoC Updates

2013-08-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 23, 2013, at 01:51 AM, Abhilash Raj wrote: >I actually don't have the remember the count but some 10 or so doctests >were failing. If possible, you can just ignore these for now. Let's take a more detailed look when I land the nose2-based tests in trunk. -Barry __

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Re: GSoC Updates

2013-08-22 Thread Abhilash Raj
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:14 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 16, 2013, at 03:13 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > >>> > Also one more thing while running tests i noticed many other tests are >>> > breaking as initially a simple message could pass though >>> > "default-posting-chain" but now we need

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Re: GSoC Updates

2013-08-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 16, 2013, at 03:12 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: >2) RSA or DSA keys? > >DSA can only be used for signing but is faster than RSA, although for >now our scope is limited to signing later on we "will" add encryption so >I think we should stick to RSA? RSA probably. I don't think the difference in

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Re: GSoC Updates

2013-08-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 16, 2013, at 03:13 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: >> > Also one more thing while running tests i noticed many other tests are >> > breaking as initially a simple message could pass though >> > "default-posting-chain" but now we need a multipart/signed message. So >> > should I worry about chan