Alessandro Vesely writes:
> Camera-ready is cleaner than anything I have heard till now.
Clean, maybe, but Mark explained why the scheme is fragile even if you
can get participation. The killer problem is personalization, but the
other problems are also intractable. Serial numbers in the
On 11/06/2016 09:58 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> Camera-ready is cleaner than anything I have heard till now.
> Probably it is not workable, but I cannot understand why. It works well
> in several publishing environments, typically journals, which distribute
> templates to authors. Why
On Sun 06/Nov/2016 09:17:53 +0100 Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
The idea is to add a footer only in case it is not present,
Aside from the technical difficulties that Mark describes, this
suffers from a really big defect: for this to be actually useful,
you'd need
On Sat 05/Nov/2016 19:51:13 +0100 Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 11/05/2016 04:11 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The idea is to add a footer only in case it is not present, similar to
what is done with subject_prefix. By properly setting both of them, a
sender can submit what can be called a
Removing known MM-DEV subscribers, the CC list is getting long.
David Andrews writes:
> At 11:06 AM 11/5/2016, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> >However, I've just become aware that Microsoft has implemented another
> >"feature". [...] one of the tests is the To: and
> >From: addresses are the same.
Alessandro Vesely writes:
> The idea is to add a footer only in case it is not present,
Aside from the technical difficulties that Mark describes, this
suffers from a really big defect: for this to be actually useful,
you'd need near-100% participation (Authenticated Received Chain has
the same
