Barry Warsaw writes:
> It will probably make no difference, but if we can inform users as
> to the real culprits in this mess, they can either complain to
> their ISPs or vote with their feet and find a new provider. That
> won't happen if they continue to blame the list software or site.
We
On 11/07/2016 06:05 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> With some verbiage massaging perhaps, I am supportive of a "hammer" option
> such as this. Maybe we can't enable it by default, but I don't think it's
> unreasonable for site/list admins to be able to be more proactive in their
> rejection of such m
On Nov 06, 2016, at 05:39 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Maybe it's time to default to rejecting posts from p=reject domains,
>with the explanatory message:
>
>Your domain publishes a "p=reject" DMARC policy, which is a
>statement to recipients that they allow you to send only
>authen
