On 3/3/20 7:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> I think we should check if this is the same in Mailman 3, and change
> it if it is. If we have an attribute whose main function is to
> populate a header field, it should accept any valid value for that
> field (POLA). Unless there's a Very Good
Note change from Mailman [2] Users to Mailman Developers.
Mark Sapiro writes on mailman-us...@python.org:
> On 3/3/20 2:25 AM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
> > It seems very explicit that the explicit reply address is
> > singular.. would making it e...@x.com, e...@y.com work?
>
> It won't work.
