On 2/1/21 3:25 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Richard Damon writes:
>
> > It is one of the 'Markdown' codes for a horizontal rule
>
> But 72 of them? Don't most people use about 5?
But if they are using it AS the horizontal rule in a plain text
document, it could easily be that long.
> > wil
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 10:18:22PM -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 1/30/21 9:40 PM, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:22:43AM -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> The issue is that the 'footer' separator that was used isn't really
>>> a truely distinctive line, just a line with some number
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 07:40:17PM +0100, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
>> Why did we do that?
>
> Because it makes sense. The message footer is identical to a signature
> in every respect:
Ah, no. It is not.
> [..] It doesn't matter if such a footer or signature is add
Richard Damon writes:
> It is one of the 'Markdown' codes for a horizontal rule
But 72 of them? Don't most people use about 5?
> will occasionally end up with a line like that when documenting an
> electrical signal that is always low (at least for a given
> example).
OK, that's very plaus
