First let me make clear that (1) I do have influence on Mailman's
position here but (2) I am not authoritative and (3) Mailman has no
position yet. I'm discussing this and that and we'll see where my
position and eventually Mailman's come out. So anything I say may be
wrong (always check my logic
On Tue 13/Sep/2022 10:14:12 +0200 Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Maintaining synchronization of configurations of two lists will be tedious
for the admin, or involve relatively complicated coding if we arrange to
automatically mirror configuration changes.
Couldn't syml
Alessandro Vesely writes:
> It would also be possible to link DB tables,
No, it's not. It's all one row (IIRC).
> or to define triggers that replicate insert/ update/ delete on a
> number of tables/ fields.
Which is exactly the complexity I don't want in Mailman if we can
avoid it. Keep
