[Mailman-Developers] Puzzling doubled-period bug

2010-04-12 Thread A.M. Kuchling
I've run into a puzzling problem that I can't yet reproduce: our Mailman installation sometimes doubles periods in the HTML portion of a message, sometimes breaking a link or image as a result. Does anyone recall seeing this before? For example, here's the difference between the HTML before it's

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Should Mailman provide periodic activity summaries to list owners?

2009-05-25 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 01:27:35PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Would it be desirable and feasible to send a periodic (options: daily, > weekly, monthly, never) activity summary to list owners (similar to > the tracker summaries that many trackers send to associated mailing > lists)? There'

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Looking for Help

2008-10-07 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:14:56AM -0400, Thomas M Foley wrote: > response, http://www.verticalresponse.com. They would like some > assistance in developing some back end tools and interface to do tracking > on their mailings. I have a Mailman branch at https://code.launchpad.net/~amk/mailman/b

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Subscribers suddenly"disappear"

2008-08-08 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:58:07PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> recursive or a complicated graph. One experiment would be to create a >> list with, say, 100,000 random [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses and benchmark >> how much time it takes to unpickle it. I'll try to do that tomorrow >> on a real co

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-Users] Subscribers suddenly"disappear"

2008-08-05 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:13:07PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I wonder if the list cache is still worth it? I've run into trouble > with it in the recent past and I suspect that whatever benefits we got > from it in ancient times, may not be so relevant today. My first I expect cPickle o

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Proposed merges

2008-06-10 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Mark, I'm curious. Are you looking for review of the merge proposals, > or adding them for the record keeping? I'm wondering because I'm > happy to review any merge proposal you want (and would like to > experiment with this fe

[Mailman-Developers] Copy of Spertus dynamic-list patch

2008-05-14 Thread A.M. Kuchling
For work I'm taking a look at Ellen Spertus's dynamic sublist patches. I've taken the patch from http://sourceforge.net/projects/dsub/, removed some extraneous stuff (like the diffs for the configure script) and added a few notes on what the patch does. The modified patch is at http://www.amk.ca/f

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GNU Mailman Site Redesign

2008-05-12 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:34:30PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Hi Andrew, thanks for taking a look at this. It's not a high priority > for me, but I know the FSF is interested in this. Noted; I haven't been looking any further at the task, and don't expect to have time for this at all until a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GNU Mailman Site Redesign

2008-04-21 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 09:01:38PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Confluence does support getting a dump of its pages in XML format, > which I've done. I'm leery of publishing the url widely though > because I haven't had a chance to look through it, so I don't know if > there is any sensitive

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GNU Mailman Site Redesign

2008-04-09 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:08:57PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > [1] Admittedly the wiki is not running on free software. As much as I > like Confluence, this is an issue for a GNU project like Mailman. > However, again I don't think we yet have the resources to maintain our > own wiki, let

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Enhancing the bounce log

2008-03-13 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:24:57PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I've looked at the patch, and I wonder why it doesn't include the '<' > and '>' in the log entries. According to RFC 2822, the '<' and '>' are I had a vague wrong impression that Mailman didn't include them in the logs; I've uploaded a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Enhancing the bounce log

2008-03-10 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:02:12PM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > In any case, I think the > > hre = re.compile('^>?\s*message-id:\s*(<.*>)', re.IGNORECASE) > > re will likely find anything to be found and is unlikely to find false > hits. Excellent point! I've written up a patch using the regex:

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Documentation status?

2008-03-10 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Actually, I found a few minutes to review this. The branch looks > good, +1 for merging it to 2.1. Should I do a push to the 2.1 branch, or will you or Mark pull it into 2.1? (I think I have commit privileges at this point, but I'

[Mailman-Developers] Enhancing the bounce log

2008-03-07 Thread A.M. Kuchling
I'd like to produce improved bounce statistics from Mailman's logs; for example, I'd like to track, per message, how many recipients there were and how many of them bounced. This means the logs need to include the message ID. Most of Mailman's logs (smtp, post, vette) include the ID, but the cri

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Documentation status?

2008-03-07 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:08AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I think the GFDL would probably be more appropriate: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL > I'm not as well versed on this license; what do people think about that? The major issue with the GFDL is that for a while, Debian

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Documentation status?

2008-03-05 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:53:21PM -0500, Terri Oda wrote: > The master latex file is probably the one on my hard drive/checked > into source control (uhh, it was in svn, but it might not have made > it to bazaar, in which case, that's my bad and I'll see what I can > do), ... Thanks! Look

[Mailman-Developers] Documentation status?

2008-03-05 Thread A.M. Kuchling
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the master copy now? The LaTeX source for the docs isn't in the Bazaar repository, beyond a copy in the Japanese translation (./messages/ja/doc/mailman-member.tex). The wiki page at http://wiki.list.org/display/DOC/Mailman+2.1+List+Admi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Web UI redux

2008-03-05 Thread A.M. Kuchling
yOn Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Ethan Fremen wrote: > Barry said in an earlier message that there's no web UI for mm3: my > first impulse is to start on something there. I'm interested in working on a REST-style interface for controlling Mailman. One thought: should the web UI be wri

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Logging lossage

2008-02-13 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:35:21AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > This is one nice thing about SpamAssassin: it tells you which rules > were triggered. This reminds me of Mailman's most annoying reason for holding a message, the 'suspicious header' error/warning. It doesn't say what the head

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Feedback for mailman developers

2008-02-07 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:52:07PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > I see no reason why the reasons for not adding the proposed feature > given in that thread have been invalidated. If you have significant This patch includes two things, though: HTML headers and footers, and the 1-click unsubs

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives

2007-07-21 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:16:19AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Cool. I wonder if lurker is compatible with Python 2.5's > mailbox.Maildir implementation and whether the two could share the > maildirs. Thanks for the information! It had better be -- Maildir has a published specification. If

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Styling patch

2007-05-08 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:43:36AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Andrew, when you created the modernize_21_webui branch, did you set > it up with svnmerge? I think it would be a good idea to > systematically merge 2.1 branch changes into the modernize branch. No svnmerge initialization, but I

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Styling patch

2007-05-08 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:06:14AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I'm not so sure. I feel very uncomfortable making /any/ non-bug-fix > changes to 2.1, perhaps even limiting them to critical bug fixes that > address security or reliability issues. Better (IMO) to fairly > quickly get a conser

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Styling patch

2007-05-05 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:24:27AM -0400, Terri Oda wrote: > Have the CSS generated by a CGI (which could then use these variables > if they're available). > - extra processing for each web request > + could lay groundwork to make it possible to change settings on a > per-list (or per virt-doma

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Should we move to Bazaar?

2007-05-03 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 08:50:16AM -0700, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SVK What about SVK's speed, though? There was discussion of providing a DVCS mirror of the Python SVN, so I tried at making a copy of the repository via SVK, and SVK looked like it was going to be

[Mailman-Developers] Styling patch

2007-05-03 Thread A.M. Kuchling
Patch #1415956 from Bryan Carbonnell adds CSS for styling purposes and changes the HTML to be valid XHTML1.0. It still needs some tidying up, and it still uses tables for layout, but that patch takes us halfway there. It presents one big compatibility issue that will probably need to be fixed. T

[Mailman-Developers] Starting a CSS wiki page

2007-05-03 Thread A.M. Kuchling
I've started a page with random notes about adding CSS: http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/StyledPages Edit away! Given my interest in the archiver, I'm starting by looking at the archive templates and noting some ideas for what should be added. --amk __

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Templating the interface

2007-05-02 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:41:58AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > initially and ran into problems there too. He may have moved to > Genshi toward the end of the project. I know there are many other > templating systems out there, such as PTL (from Quixote) but I don't > have much experience w

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Templating the interface

2007-05-02 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:47:40AM -0400, Ethan Fremen wrote: > Right now, I think the "low hanging fruit" is to rip out all the HTML > 'style' markup and make all the style applied via stylesheets. Agreed. I'd be happy to embark on that effort while waiting for the trunk to settle down. --amk

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Non-member post confirmation

2003-08-28 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:03:38PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I'm beginning to think that I may have to put out a Mailman 2.2 and if > so, this feature would be a good candidate. I'd also really like to get my RSS patch in (patch #657951). --amk ___