On 13-03-01 01:43 PM, Chris Cargile wrote:
On the matter of communications, I might hope to take yet a moment to
address my goals, motivations, and expectations for contributing to the
quite-worthy, well-thought-out and respectable mailman3 *team* effort and
re-establish what might be already see
On 9/2/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This version is not yet recommended for production environments,
> however testing and feedback is greatly encouraged. My plan is to
> release 2.1.9 final by 10-Sep-2006. A more detailed list of changes
> will be included in the final release a
On 8/31/05, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the very least, we must drop Python 2.1 and 2.2.
+1
> If we must continue to support Python 2.3, so be it, but I'd like
> to leapfrog even that version. There are several Python 2.4 constructs
> and modules that I'd dearly love to be able
On 8/17/05, Joseph Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that when I use a web interface to create or delete a
> mailing list, (CGI or my XMLRPC interface), the ownership of my
> data/aliases file does not change. However if I use bin/newlist or
> bin/rmlist as root, the ownership on data
Yay, upgraded. :)
Is the bug you mentioned below filed on SF? Just wondering what the
issue is, and specifically if this will fix a problem I've seen with
SpamAssassin-tagged mail leaking through to my mailman@ list despite a
header_filter_rule that really should be blocking it... but haven't
had
Is there an updated timeline for the final 2.1.6 release? It won't be
in February... :)
Thanks,
Bryan
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:46:19 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I've pushed the 2.1.6b4 tarball out to SourceForge (now that file
> uploads are working again ;). I will like
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:03:34 +0800, pabs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this list broken, or has everyone left?
Everyone's waiting expectantly for 2.1.6 to come out. I expect
there'll be a bunch of posts of various types once that happens. :)
Bryan
___
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:15:44 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I plan on installing the current 2.1.6
> on my various sites and I hope others can do the same thing to help test
> 2.1.6 in order to get an end-of-February release.
I'm willing to install the pending beta 4 if it
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:32:58 -0800, Chuq Von Rospach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I think its safe to say that it's not lack of interest or intent here
> with any of us, but a lack of free time. And time, of course is one
> commodity you can't do much about some times.
Ditto. My daughter ju
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:55:51 -0800, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First is all text entered via the web admin interface is HTML escaped
> resulting in the <, etc.
>
> To avoid this, set the text for member_moderation_notice using
> bin/config_list instead of using the web interface.
Th
Hi Tokio et al,
Is there a roadmap for 2.1.6 betas and release? Haven't seen anything
since this post. (but maybe I missed a message?)
Thanks,
Bryan
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:35:01 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Developers and I18Ners,
>
> I've bumped version number of mailma
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:36:55 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And also, mailman 2.2 will no be out before next summer. I expect many
> venders are including Python 2.4 by that time.
As a perhaps extraneous data point supporting this, the FreeBSD
lang/python port was bumped from
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:59:24 +0200, Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However there's something that could be very useful, that would be "search
> fuzzy matches", for instance if <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes to me saying
> that he needs to be unsubscribed, I can't easily locate his subscription if
Someone might want to look at this.
admin.root:/> host www.list.org
Host not found.
admin.root:/> host list.org
list.org mail is handled (pri=100) by colossus.bilow.com
list.org mail is handled (pri=10) by mail.zork.org
I tried direct queries to all the listed name servers, none are
returning A r
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 10:45 AM, Bill Bradford wrote:
2.1 works fine for me, *except*
When I go to http://mysite/mailman/admindb/, it asks for the
list password. I give it, get the "held for moderation/approval" queue
of messages, pick my choices on each, and hit submit.
I then get
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Unfortunately no. Due to recent changes in my work situation, I'm
only able to work on Mailman in my spare time these days.
Ah, that sucks.
I find it's nearly impossible just to keep up on the lists.
Yeah, release of 2.1 has
Howdy,
Is there an ETA on 2.1.1? It's hard to justify using sources from CVS
in production, and it's becoming a bit annoying trying to remember all
the patches to apply when a new fix comes along. :)
Thanks,
Bryan
___
Mailman-Developers mailing lis
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 10:05 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
Mybe I should rephrase my question.
Would'nt it be better if mailman can log either in a logfile or in a
user
configurable SysLog facility?
I mean, for each logfile that mm creates, could it be possible to
specify a
filename or a sy
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 09:49 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
wouldn't be a good idea to log the start and stop of mailmanctl in the
syslog?
This information is effectively logged in logs/qrunner, as seen below,
though it might be nice to have a single log-line entry indicating the
commands pa
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 09:06 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 07:24 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Please try this patch.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
index.php?func=detail&aid=668819&group_id=103&atid=300103
This looks good. I've appl
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 07:24 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Please try this patch.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
index.php?func=detail&aid=668819&group_id=103&atid=300103
This looks good. I've applied it - will let you know how digests look
when they go out (midnight).
Thanks!
Bry
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 12:12 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
3. Do a + b + c
I don't entirely understand this -1/0/+1 thing, but option 3 would be
my preference.
Bryan
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 04:25 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
I've been swamped with Zope work, a upcoming studio project, and
getting ready for the Spam conference. Trust me, I'm taking all these
messages with me on my laptop. 6:30 hours each way on the train
should give me plenty of time
Howdy,
Nobody seems to be answering questions in mailman-users (is Barry
away?), so I'll try this one here.
There's a setting in Defaults.py which seems to be just what my
customers are looking for to limit the headers being shown in their
plain digests - DEFAULT_PLAIN_DIGEST_KEEP_HEADERS. How
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 03:49 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
Unfortunately, for some reason bin/check_perms doesn't check
permissions on the aliases* files in the data directory - this should
be fixed (I'll look at a patch in a bit).
Just looking at this, there's a commen
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 05:32 PM, Kory Wheatley wrote:
I received the below error when I tried to create a mailing list from
the Mailman web interface page. It did add the list into the alias
file,
but it
failed to run "postalias" probably because of permission issue's I'm
guessing.
I
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:48 AM, John W Baxter wrote:
At 1:02 -0500 11/20/2002, Phil Barnett wrote:
Sending passwords as plaintext in 2002 is downright negligent
considering the
current state of sniffing, monitoring and penetration.
So...we stop calling them passwords.
I'm on so m
his address book, he grabbed all of those
> addresses, too.
The perils of Ease of Use. I have a crapload of people in my OS X
Address Book
that Mail.app's been happily storing away for a rainy day. Luckily for
them, I'm not
likely to be excited enough about anything to add them a
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> I noticed MM 2.0.9 available for download on sourceforge, but I never
> saw an announcement for it. Checking the mailman-announce archives
> confirms this. Was this intentional?
It's also not on ftp.gnu.org yet, which combine
29 matches
Mail list logo
