Sorry for this OT question.
I am about to start writing my final paper soon and have been looking
around for interesting topics.
With e-mail being so large a part of almost everybody's daily working
routine, one (me) would think that the actual e-mail
format/protocol/standard would have a rat
>I´m creating a moderated list, but I´d like to avoid the automated
>response to posters advicing that "your email is being held until the
>list moderator can review it for approval".
>
>In the Auto-responder section of the Administration site I set to "No"
>the question "Should Mailman s
I saw this on the Mailman 2.1 Wiki page:
"Provide an email interface to all administrative commands"
Does this include the approval of moderated messages?
If so, has any work been done on this or do you know how it will work?
Will it be (or is it already) possible to have the approval sent to mo
Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>What version of Mailman are you running? I'd be interested in looking
>at any patches that help port Mailman to Windows (or any other
>platform for that matter). I develop on Linux these days, and before
>leaving CNRI, primarily Solaris. I'm fairly confident Mailman runs
I wrote:
> > We chaned to Mailman because we needed some things LISTSERV didn't
> > have.
J C Lawrence asked:
>Like what? (might as well pump up our strengths)
LISTSERV probably has the most features, but what I meant was that we now
have the option of changing whatever we want to.
Some messag
We have been running Mailman on Windows for about two weeks now and most
things seem to work very well.
To make it run I had to make some changes - all of them minor - and most of
them related to opening files ('b').
Mailmanwin (as I have named it) is probably not useful for anyone but me
(and
Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>My interpretation of this section is that since regular deliveries use
>the From: field supplied by the original author, but it is Mailman's
>responsibility for sending the mail through the system, the Sender:
>field ought to be the human responsible for list maintenance,
>
Why is the 'sender' header field set to the list admin address?
E.g.: Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm asking because I haven't seen this elsewhere.
Elsewhere being LISTSERV and eGroups.
I probably wouldn't have noticed if it wasn't because Outlook 2000 (maybe
other versions) shows this informatio
