Congratulations guys on a nice piece of software!!
Although my earlier posts to this list were problem posts, I don't want
anyone to infer that Mailman is problematic. The problem was with
sendmail, not Mailman, and now that I've had Mailman 2.1rc1 running for
a few days, I can confidently say th
eij)
2. email package bug (Jon Parise)
3. Re: email package bug (Jon Parise)
4.
can't resolve "smrsh: mailman not available for sendmail
programs"
issue (Keith Steward)
5.
FW: [Mailman-Users] can't resolve "smrsh: mailman not available
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] can't resolve "smrsh: mailman not available
for sendmail programs" issue
--On Sunday, December 29, 2002 17:20:22 -0800 Keith Steward
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
" error.
thanks
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Danny Terweij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Keith Steward; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] can't resolve "smrsh: mailman not available
for sendmail programs
Arg!!!
After several attempts to get Mailman installed (including stable 2.0
final, and newest 2.1rc1), and hitting unresolvable "smrsh: mailman not
available for sendmail programs" issues (despite trying numerous
things), i'm just about ready to give up.
I've been able to get Mailman t
