[Mailman-Developers] Bug in Mailman 2.1.4 {Subscription problem}

non-standard maybe: Web server ("hubble") is Redhat9 Mail server ("hypatia") is Solaris 8 -- mailman installed on both Many thanks for mailman, and for your consideration of this report. Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer St

Re: [Mailman-Developers] bug in Mailman 2.1.4 ??

place (web server). Thanks a lot for your help, and for mailman in general (and do apologize for having disturbed you!) BTW: It seems 2.1.4 did catch much more bounce messages than 2.1.3: In about 10 hours, I didn't have one of the "Uncaught bounce notification" messages

[Mailman-Developers] bug in Mailman 2.1.4 ??

8; Web server (apache) on Linux Redhat 9. This had worked fine with Mailman 2.1.3. to which we had to revert ASAP. We got the following in a browser window. Do you have any ideas what could have gone wrong? Regards, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~ma

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Uncaught bounce notification ..

>>>>> "J" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> on Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:05:45 -0500 writes: J> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:52:07 +0100 J> Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My problem is that I get abou

[Mailman-Developers] Uncaught bounce notification ..

many (like the following) very it seems very easy to do both (recognize bounce format and extract member address; in the attached example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is clearly subscribed to the mailing list "r-help"). Regards, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maec

[Mailman-Developers] "@" in mail **text** gets replaced in archives

ch back to keep e-mail addresses unaltered. which caters to the spammers address-collection robots... Of course that's a bug in mailman/pipermail ===> forwarding to the developers. Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statist

[Mailman-Developers] Uncaught bounce {that should be caught!}

gaard BSA) 5. Re: potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex (A.J. Rossini) 6. rank(*) with NAs -- new option "keep" desired (Martin Maechler) 7. Re: potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 8. Re: potentially nas

[Mailman-Developers] Another "uncaught bounce" that should have been

{Mailman 2.1.1} I hope this continues to help improving the already good mailman software! Martin --- Begin Message --- The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted from it. This mailing list has been co

[Mailman-Developers] MM 2.1.1: another uncaught bounce that should have been caught

Dear developers, thank you very much for an already fantastic product! I hope the following is helpful for improving this part of mailman... Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO C16Leonhardstr. 27 ETH (Federa

[Mailman-Developers] Bad "Uncaught bounce" [forwarded]

follows - ... while talking to akasolvr.vub.ac.be.: >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <<< 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User mathie.roelants unknown at vub.ac.be 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown - Message header follows - Thanks a lot

[Mailman-Developers] Feature wish: Regexp Filtering on *body* (not just header)

move all my mailing lists from majordomo to mailman! Hi regards, to your good work, and a Happy New Year! Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO C16Leonhardstr. 27 ETH (Federal Inst. Technology) 8092 Zurich SWITZERLAND