Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I've heard that Debian is working on Ubuntu-like PPAs. That would seem like a > fruitful way of providing the entire stack for older distros. What about just a backport of Python 3.4 (and any future mailman3 package)? http://backports.debia

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > Not for those wanting to avoid systemd. systemd is optional and easy to avoid in Debian. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org htt

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman (core) 3.0b5

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > So, wheezy admins will be left out in the cold. I expect Debian jessie will become Debian stable soon enough. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Deve

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Deb packages for Mailman 3 suite, beta 1 preview

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Chuck Peters wrote: > Has anyone been working on Debian/Ubuntu packages? >From our discussions at DebConf14 it sounds like Barry Warsaw is working on this but I don't think it will be ready in time. I also think it is far too early to package mailman3 in a stable

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Git mirror for mailman

git itself has git-remote-bzr that works well so I don't think this is needed, git users can just checkout direct from bzr to git. The only issue I can find with it is that push to launchpad doesn't appear to work right now. https://bugs.debian.org/714038 -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSOC Project idea: OpenPGP integration

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > I am a undergrad student interested in OpenPGP integration in mailman as a > GSOC project this summer. Here is a semi-related idea; use OpenPGP instead of passwords for authentication to the web interface, possibly using monkeysphere: http://

Re: [Mailman-Developers] A feature I'd like to emphasize for GSoC ...

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Florian Fuchs wrote: > This could be something for a HTML(5)/JS/CSS savvy person (to make it > *really* convenient). I'm thinking scrollable log views, that > interactively append/prepend entries to the view, depending on your > position in the log file. Or comment

Re: [Mailman-Developers] anti-spam filter

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Pratik Sarkar wrote: > What is this signature.asc file.? See RFC 2015. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Mailman-Developers] anti-spam filter

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > That's a great idea (and a great example of why I don't think > spam-filtering technology should be embedded in a Mailman handler! :-) I think you might not be thinking expansively enough, it allows more flexibility to do spam filterin

Re: [Mailman-Developers] anti-spam filter

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Pratik Sarkar wrote: >Is the anti-spam/abuse filter still being seriously considered > as a gsoc project this year? One really useful thing to have would be removal of spam from archives. Here are some examples of how it has been done before: The Deb

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hi from a student interested in a GSoC project

In addition to Augeas, I would encourage you to look at Config::Model. I think you will need the pair of them to do upgrades. There are a number of blog posts on Planet Debian about it and I'm sure the author would be willing to help out. http://planet-search.debian.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi?terms=Co

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSOC Project idea: OpenPGP integration

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > I am a undergrad student interested in OpenPGP integration in mailman as a > GSOC project this summer. Cool! I'm not sure about the scope of your project but you may want to review some prior efforts: http://schleuder2.nadir.org/ http://www.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman / archive-ui / licensing questions

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Bob Puff wrote: > I think the majority of MM users will be simply using the RPM that comes with > their distro, and there is a real benefit to stuff working right "out of the > box".  This includes the Archiving functions. > > Its great to have options, and giving

Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman / archive-ui / licensing questions

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I don't think you're going to find the will to make this sort of decision > right at this instant because what we want the archiver ecosystem to look > like for mailman3 is somewhat in the air.  Do we really want an obviously > less capable

Re: [Mailman-Developers] MM3: list disabling/enabling?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > It sounds like a lot, but I'd think it's only a day or two of work, and I'm > happy to answer questions, review code, etc. I would like to get the design right first, after reading the full thread a couple of times, some thoughts: By bounce

Re: [Mailman-Developers] MM3: less generic names for scripts in $PATH?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > `master` and `runner` are a bit more problematic because they are pretty handy > as separate commands.  I don't think they belong under `bin/mailman` and since > they're of internal use only, I would never expect them to be installed into > /

Re: [Mailman-Developers] MM3: list disabling/enabling?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I've thought about this on and off over the years and still think it's a good > idea.  No, MM3 does not have such a thing yet. ... > Yep Ok, great. > but I'd like to understand the semantics first.  Do messages to the list > get bounced, an

[Mailman-Developers] MM3: list disabling/enabling?

Hi all, For the Indymedia Mailman 2 install, we have a patch that allowed list disabling (and later re-enabling). Disabled lists had their settings/archives saved, did not accept mail and were listed on a separate page to listinfo. For a long-lived large mailman server serving local groups in many

[Mailman-Developers] MM3: less generic names for scripts in $PATH?

Hi all, I was looking at Mailman 3 to see how many of the Indymedia patches for Mailman 2 would be still needed. The first thing that struck me was how generic the files that were installed in $PATH. I would really recommend mm-master, mm-runner, mm-onebounce or similar instead of the current mas

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Install problems for mailman-3.0.0a7 on Debian Squeeze

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Pavel Šimerda wrote: > Wouldn't it be nice to have some more reasonable way to present this > info to the user? Agreed. Does distutils have the equivalent of autoconf for checking for dependencies before starting the build? If so I assume mailman patches for this

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Install problems for mailman-3.0.0a7 on Debian Squeeze

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, ardeshir wrote: > Don't know if this will help you, but I got the following errors while > installing on my system, > Running Squeeze Debian ... > src/zope/interface/_zope_interface_coptimizations.c:15:20: error: Python.h: > No such file or directory > src/zope/

Re: [Mailman-Developers] pipermail feature request for View by Date

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > As far as I can tell, patches to implement the feature seen at > > have never been submitted upstream. AFAICT, those pages are generated by MHonArc, not pipermail. De

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.x Roadmap

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Please don't start (or extend) a list of downstream things to look at > in the week before a release. First of all, I'm just compulsive enough > to actually look, but even so, the most likely result is I'll be > overwhelmed, defer everything an

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.x Roadmap

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Saturday 3 January 2009 20:51, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Within the next few days, I plan to release Mailman 2.1.12rc1. This >> release contains several minor bug fixes since 2.1.11 and is updated >> for compatibility with Python 2.6. It wi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Getting Started with Mailman Development

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there were branches on Launchpad that were ready for review, I'd be happy > to take a look at them. They should definitely include tests and > documentation, and a description of the design should probably be added to

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Getting Started with Mailman Development

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe this code could be hosted on Launchpad as a Bazaar branch? What about merging it into the 2.2 or 3.0 branches? Also: Indymedia did a summary of encrypted mailing list options in 2006: http://lists.indymedia.org/pip

Re: [Mailman-Developers] The Approved: header in MM3

On 10/3/07, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. We can drop the concept altogether. > > Sounds reasonable to me. I've used it before as a site admin to mail lists saying that the list will be closed for whatever reason (since it supports using the site password to approve stuff). Perso

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives

On 7/3/07, Terri Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to remember all the things people have suggested for the > archives in the past so I can figure out what needs to be done and > what might be nice to have, and see if this is doable in the time I > have in the foreseeable future. At lis