Re: [Mailman-Developers] Suggestions about Mailman bounce processing

2010-12-29 Thread Superticker2 (Mark)
Mark *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/28/2010 at 3:29 PM Mark Sapiro wrote: >Superticker2 (Mark) wrote: >> >>If there's a service or utility that can verify a list of email addresses >>(prior to a mass operation), please suggest it. > > >There

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Suggestions about Mailman bounce processing

2010-12-29 Thread Superticker2 (Mark)
would be all I need. I just need to identify which addresses are bouncing. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/28/2010 at 2:54 PM Mark Sapiro wrote: >Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> >>Superticker2 (Mark) writes: >> >> > I appreciate your suggestion to set bou

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Suggestions about Mailman bounce processing

2010-12-28 Thread Superticker2 (Mark)
ve volunteered for admin work in some sense, and only >those who switch off bounce processing. > >Superticker2 (Mark) writes: > > > 1) We are a University campus group and the University currently > >provides a Mailman service to us. > >Sure, been there, done that, and th

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Suggestions about Mailman bounce processing

2010-12-28 Thread Superticker2 (Mark)
ed immediately of the typos--no special temporary settings required. Happy computing to you, Mark *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/27/2010 at 10:11 PM Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Superticker2 (Mark) writes: > > > I'm not a subscriber to this list, so please include

[Mailman-Developers] Suggestions about Mailman bounce processing

2010-12-27 Thread Superticker2 (Mark)
I'm not a subscriber to this list, so please include me superticker2{at}iastate.edu on your cc: line. I have two suggestions I would like to make concerning Mailman bounce processing: 1) All bounces from either a Mass Subscribe or Mass Invite operation should be unconditionally and immediately se