Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>[1] I personally wish Mark would cut his FAQ-answering time by about
>80%; there are plenty of experienced users who can do the job well enough.
Of course you are right, but there is a reason my nickname on the
acknowledgements page is "Mailman's compulsive responder
Brian J Mingus writes:
> I have only recently subscribed to this list and I can say that you
> and every other person that read my e-mail saw fit to ignore
> it.
I don't see anything in my folder or in the archives for this list
(Mailman Developers). Perhaps you are referring to your post
"E-m
On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Brian J Mingus wrote:
Perhaps the failure of the mailman dev team to attract community
participation can be related not to any crazy versioning scheme but
rather
to a failure to engage with the community. I have only recently
subscribed
to this list and I can say
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> As you know, Mailman 2.1 has long been in maintenance-only mode. Mailman
> 2.2 was where we were going to add new features and update the user
> interface, without changing the basic model. Mailman 3 was where we were
> going to fix the mode
