John Levine writes:
> You just need one DNS entry, for *.remail.lists.org. Believe it or
> not, that's legal, valid, standard, etc.
Legal, valid, and useful, yes. However, it's generally considered a
poor practice because it means that all of those domains exist, which
makes it hard to debug
>>> that points to a server that rewrites the address and remails it, e.g.
>>> mme...@yahoo.com.remail.lists.org -> mme...@yahoo.com.
>I'm not very expert in this area, but it seems at least with the above,
>you'd need DNS entries for yahoo.com.remail.lists.org,
>aol.com.remail.lists.org, thenexto
On 05/16/2014 08:50 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> and a really evil one where you append a name
>> that points to a server that rewrites the address and remails it, e.g.
>> mme...@yahoo.com.remail.lists.org -> mme...@yahoo.com.
>
> This is apparently what LISTSERV does, give or take details of the
> s
> and a really evil one where you append a name
>that points to a server that rewrites the address and remails it, e.g.
>mme...@yahoo.com.remail.lists.org -> mme...@yahoo.com.
This is apparently what LISTSERV does, give or take details of the
syntax of the forwarding address.
Has anyone tried thi
