Marc Egli writes:
> Ok but i can add a script to Mailman which accepts a path to a mail
> file, then reads that file and gives a csv list back.
Yes, I would think so. The FSF likes to bluster that programs running
in separate processes that interact with each other via standard
interprocess ch
On Nov 05, 2010, at 06:36 PM, Marc Egli wrote:
>Ok but i can add a script to Mailman which accepts a path to a mail file,
>then reads that file and gives a csv list back. In my application i can exec
>this script. The script is under GPL and could bee added to Mailman if anyone
>else finds it usef
Am 05.11.2010 um 17:55 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
> The plugin really needs to be designed as a separate program with a
> single entry point and enumerated options (at most, with simple data
> types like strings and integers as arguments) to qualify as borderline
> here. However, the Bouncer API
Marc Egli writes:
> Now my question is: can i release my application under a less
> restrictive license like the bsd license?
Probably not.
> According to the gpl-faq this is a borderline case because i only
> invoke a function and wait for the response.
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-fa
On Nov 05, 2010, at 04:01 PM, Marc Egli wrote:
>We are building a newsletter application for the django framework. For bounce
>detection we want to use the Mailman bouncerAPI because reimplementing would
>be a bad idea. Now my question is: can i release my application under a less
>restrictive lic
We are building a newsletter application for the django framework. For bounce
detection we want to use the Mailman bouncerAPI because reimplementing would be
a bad idea. Now my question is: can i release my application under a less
restrictive license like the bsd license? I don't distribute Mai
