On 11/25/2014 08:41 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Aurelien Bompard writes:
>
> > I suggest we leave the member's moderation_action on None when it's
> > created, and modify the moderation rules to go look for the list's default
> > setting if the member's value is None.
>
> I think this is
On Nov 26, 2014, at 07:18 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>On 11/25/2014 10:20 PM, Andrew Partan wrote:
>> Say you have a list where a large argument breaks out. I want to
>> change the list to moderated for a while until everyone calms down.
>> Then change it back to unmoderated. There are some people w
On Nov 25, 2014, at 08:59 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>MM 2.1 does have an additional capability in the web UI, namely the
>ability to set all members mod bits on or off with an off/on radio
>selection and a single click. Thus, an admin can change
>default_member_moderation to No or Yes and with a coup
On 11/25/2014 10:20 PM, Andrew Partan wrote:
> Say you have a list where a large argument breaks out. I want to
> change the list to moderated for a while until everyone calms down.
> Then change it back to unmoderated. There are some people who are
> always moderated and others who are always un
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:05:13PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> MM3 collapses that so that rather than having a flag with a fallback action,
> each member just has an action. This allows you more flexibility in
> controlling an individual member's posting privileges, at the cost of having
> to cha
On 11/25/2014 01:05 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> I think this does work differently in MM2.1, but that version's schema isn't
> really sophisticated enough to do anything different. There, members have a
> moderation flag which gets initialized from default_member_moderation. Then,
> if the membe
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>As a result, unless I'm missing something changing, the list's
>default_moderation_action has no effect on existing members. Do I
>understand correctly?
That is correct. As Steve points out, the intent is that this setting is
initialization
On 11/25/14, 5:46 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
Hi *,
I'd like to discuss the algorithm we use to enforce a list's default
moderation action. Here's what I understand:
- the list's default_moderation_action setting is stored in the database
and can be changed via the REST interface
- when a new me
Aurelien Bompard writes:
> I suggest we leave the member's moderation_action on None when it's
> created, and modify the moderation rules to go look for the list's default
> setting if the member's value is None.
I think this is a bad idea. From the subscriber's perspective, it
changes the li
Hi *,
I'd like to discuss the algorithm we use to enforce a list's default
moderation action. Here's what I understand:
- the list's default_moderation_action setting is stored in the database
and can be changed via the REST interface
- when a new member is created, its moderation_action is import
10 matches
Mail list logo
