Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>What version of Mailman are you running? I'd be interested in looking
>at any patches that help port Mailman to Windows (or any other
>platform for that matter). I develop on Linux these days, and before
>leaving CNRI, primarily Solaris. I'm fairly confident Mailman runs
I wrote:
> > We chaned to Mailman because we needed some things LISTSERV didn't
> > have.
J C Lawrence asked:
>Like what? (might as well pump up our strengths)
LISTSERV probably has the most features, but what I meant was that we now
have the option of changing whatever we want to.
Some messag
> "JJ" == Jesper Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JJ> We have been running Mailman on Windows for about two weeks
JJ> now and most things seem to work very well.
Very cool!
JJ> To make it run I had to make some changes - all of them minor
JJ> - and most of them relate
On Tue, 01 May 2001 00:54:39 +0200
Jesper Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fully understand and respect that this is a Linux project...
Actually its a GNU project, which is not at all Linux specific.
Mailman in its current incarnation is Unix-centric in a number of
ways (which subtley diff
We have been running Mailman on Windows for about two weeks now and most
things seem to work very well.
To make it run I had to make some changes - all of them minor - and most of
them related to opening files ('b').
Mailmanwin (as I have named it) is probably not useful for anyone but me
(and
