Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Mailman | The unsubscribe process using the -leave address does not work because of an `assert` in the code (#310)

On Feb 09, 2017, at 08:39 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >Except that Issue #309 was opened yesterday, well after the GL database >incident. So I would think that Issue #310 would have to have been >created after that. > >It seems that something erased or lost issue #310 after it was posted, >but I don't

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Mailman | The unsubscribe process using the -leave address does not work because of an `assert` in the code (#310)

On 02/09/2017 08:28 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > I'm not positive, but I have a theory. GL says there are only 309 issues of > both closed and open state on the mailman project. It's possible that this > one got caught up in their database incident: Except that Issue #309 was opened yesterday,

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Mailman | The unsubscribe process using the -leave address does not work because of an `assert` in the code (#310)

On Feb 09, 2017, at 07:38 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >@abompard I don't know what's going here. I received the notice below from >GitLab. I tried to go there to comment that this looks like a duplicate or at >least very similar to which >was fixed about

[Mailman-Developers] Fwd: Mailman | The unsubscribe process using the -leave address does not work because of an `assert` in the code (#310)

@abompard I don't know what's going here. I received the notice below from GitLab. I tried to go there to comment that this looks like a duplicate or at least very similar to which was fixed about 3 weeks ago, but GitLab gives me a 404 and says there