Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 07, 2013, at 06:58 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: >I was comparing what a consumer of the Postorius interface might like to see >that is not just a proxy forwarding the MM-core interface. > >As an example, rather than all of the lists, just those lists for which the >represented user is the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On May 8, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Florian Fuchs wrote: > 2013/5/7 Manish Gill : >> Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. >> >> Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the >> project and he has been very helpful in getting me started w

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On May 8, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Florian Fuchs wrote: > 2013/5/7 Manish Gill : >> Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. >> >> Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the >> project and he has been very helpful in getting me started w

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Florian Fuchs
2013/5/7 Manish Gill : > Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. > > Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the > project and he has been very helpful in getting me started with the project. > > Right now, I'm focusing on the intern

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-08 Thread Manish Gill
On 05/08/2013 10:39 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Richard Wackerbarth writes: > I appears that my communication was not as successful as I had hoped. I don't know about your communication. My point here is that the *student's* communication was insufficient. I'll be more thorough in the fu

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-07 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Richard Wackerbarth writes: > I appears that my communication was not as successful as I had hoped. I don't know about your communication. My point here is that the *student's* communication was insufficient. Posts to the list involve people who are not party to the conversion on IRC and vice

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-07 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On May 7, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Manish Gill writes: > >> So, for example, in trying to expose `MailingList` objects, as of >> now, there is no way to post messages to a list externally. > > Out of scope. You could do something that would allow a quick, urgent > message

[Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-07 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Manish Gill writes: > So, for example, in trying to expose `MailingList` objects, as of > now, there is no way to post messages to a list externally. Out of scope. You could do something that would allow a quick, urgent message to be posted, but you are very likely to embarrass yourself, and u

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-07 Thread Manish Gill
On 05/07/2013 10:18 PM, Manish Gill wrote: Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the project and he has been very helpful in getting me started with the project. Right now, I'm focusin

[Mailman-Developers] GSoC discussion

2013-05-07 Thread Manish Gill
Hey guys. This is in response to Richard's email for project discussions. Richard and I have been having discussion regarding how to proceed with the project and he has been very helpful in getting me started with the project. Right now, I'm focusing on the internal data representation of variou