On Aug 10, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Grover wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Barry Warsaw
wrote:
On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
My concern is to not create additional 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3 migration
headaches. If this is something that could ease the migration to
MM 3
by
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> My concern is to not create additional 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3 migration
>> headaches. If this is something that could ease the migration to MM 3
>> by providing a 'stepwise' path, that would be gr
On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
My concern is to not create additional 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3 migration
headaches. If this is something that could ease the migration to MM 3
by providing a 'stepwise' path, that would be great. However, if it is
viewed as something that will be done for
Andrew Grover wrote:
>
>So the next question for Mark and everyone is: do you want a
>StormDB-backed MembershipAdaptor for Mailman 2.x?
>
>There are some further questions the Systers org needs to settle
>before proceeding, about the ownership status of GSOC-produced code,
>as well as if copyright
